摘要
饶宗颐最初与古史辨派阵营有较多接触,后来他的古史观发生改变,转而反思疑古运动存在的问题。饶宗颐的古史研究,旨趣近于“罗王之学”,走的是“新证”一派的道路。在王国维“二重证据法”的基础上,饶氏将出土材料分为有文字材料与无文字材料两种,提出“三重证据法”及“五重证据法”。饶氏致力于通过传世文献、出土文献及考古遗存等材料进行古史重建。他重新思考古史的时代框架及其传说流变,并就古地理开展了一系列新的讨论,体现了对“三重证据法”的实践。
At his early career,Jao Tsung-I initially had a lot of contact with the School of Gushi bian(Debates on Ancient History). Yet his view of ancient history pivoted,and he turned to reflect on the insufficiencies of the Gushi bian movement. To him,the purpose of research about ancient history was close to what Luo Zhenyu and Wang Guowei propose,following the path of the Xinzheng(new validation). On the basis of Wang Guowei’s “dual evidence method”,Jao further divided unearthed materials into written materials and non-written materials, and proposed the “triple evidence method” as well as “quintuple evidence method”. He was committed to reconstruction of ancient history through handed-down documents,unearthed documents and archaeological remains. He rethinks the periodization framework and the evolution of legends in ancient history. His innovative work on paleogeography is a good example of the practice of “triple evidence method.”
出处
《史学理论研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2022年第3期133-143,160,共12页
Historiography Bimonthly
基金
北京语言大学一流学科团队支持计划(项目编号:GF201901)的阶段性成果。
