摘要
民国时期,重新厘定针灸知识,是时人证明中医有效性的一项重要举措。在中医科学化的背景中,诸多医家都对针灸知识革新进行探索,注重疗效与回归经典是其中颇具特色的两条革新路径。前者以承淡安为代表,注重实际疗效,对传统针灸知识和西方医学知识加以理性取舍,使其更易被初学者掌握,并为后世针灸教材奠定基本知识框架。后者则以中央国医馆委员黄竹斋为代表,其针灸著述本意是尊奉传统经典医籍,以考订、注解方式整理针灸知识,虽经国医馆推举为良好的教材,审定出版后,反响却不如预期。就内在学理而言,民国时期这两类代表性的针灸知识革新路径的不同结局,揭示了以经验理性对传统针灸知识的去芜存菁,是现代针灸知识转型的关键一环。
During the period of the Republic of China,redefining the knowledge of acupuncture was essential to the efforts to prove the effectiveness of traditional Chinese medicine.In the context of scientizing traditional Chinese medicine,many physicians found ways to realize the innovation of acupuncture knowledge.Focusing on the curative effects and returning to the classics were two distinctive paths for this endeavor.The first path was advocated by Cheng Dan’an,who stressed the actual curative effects of acupuncture and laid the basic knowledge framework for acupuncture textbooks in later generations.The second path was advocated by Huang Zhuzhai.In his book on acupuncture,Huang Zhuzhai introduced acupuncture knowledge through examination and annotation,reflecting his respect to the traditional classic medical books.Huang’s book was recognized by the Chinese Medical Center as a“good textbook.”However,the social response to it was at best lukewarm after its publication.Academically speaking,the two paths on refining acupuncture knowledge and their different outcomes laid bare the pressure to refine the traditional acupuncture knowledge based on empirical rationality,which became the crux to the transformation of modern acupuncture knowledge.
出处
《近代史研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2022年第3期36-50,M0003,共16页
Modern Chinese History Studies
基金
国家社会科学基金重大项目“宋元以来中医知识的演变与现代‘中医’的形成研究”(18ZDA175)的阶段性成果。
