摘要
《民法典》第1053条的“重大疾病”,再现《婚姻法》法定疾病禁婚条款中关于“患有医学上认为不应当结婚的疾病”的界定疑问。究其根本,立法者追求规制事物张力导致概念过度弹性化、法学与医学在概念定义上不一致,是造成司法实践再现“疾病”界定疑问的原因。然而,囿于概念教义化,学界对“重大疾病”如何界定莫衷一是。因此,有必要整理相关的法教义知识、明确概念的目的及规范立场、通过研判司法实践案例将其类型化,比如将行为能力欠缺型疾病、性功能障碍型疾病、生育障碍型疾病、传染性型疾病、遗传性型疾病等归属于《民法典》第1053条的“重大疾病”,而基于“团体主义”与体系化的要求,纯粹经济耗费型疾病不应当界定为《民法典》第1053条的“重大疾病”。
The Article 1053 of the Civil Code defines“serious diseases”,which raises questions about the definition of“diseases that are medically inadvisable for marriage”in the legal disease prohibition clause of The Marriage Law.At the root of this,the legislator’s pursuit of tension in the regulation of things has led to an overly flexible concept,and the lack of clarity between jurisprudence and medicine in terms of the authoritative discourse on the definition of the concept is the reason for the recurrences of doubts about the definition of“disease”in judicial practice.However,due to the lack of doctrinization,the academic community is divided on the definition of“seriousdiseases”.Therefore,it is necessary to collate the relevant legal knowledge,clarify the purpose and normative position of the concept,and typify it through the study of judicial practice cases.For example,the classification of“serious diseases”under The Article 1053 of The Civil Code includes incapacity,sexual dysfunctional diseases,reproductive disorders,infectious diseases,and hereditary diseases,while based on the requirements of“collectivism”and systematization,the purely economically costly diseases should not be defined as the“seriousdiseases”under The Article 1053 of The Civil Code.
作者
杨旻
YANG Min(School of Law,Hunan University,Changsha 410000,China)
出处
《湖南科技大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2022年第3期92-102,共11页
Journal of Hunan University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)
基金
国家社会科学基金重大项目(19ZDA158)。
