摘要
一次开庭审结在我国的小额诉讼中能否真正落地,需遵循民事程序法的内在机理,更需符合小额诉讼独特的程序理念与程序规则。一次开庭审结应当是基于小额程序特征、案件性质、相关程序与制度配套等多维化程序要素综合作用的结果。在保障审判质量的前提下,基于一次开庭就能使案件达到“成熟于作出裁判”之状态,不仅需要法院在适用小额诉讼程序时保持谦抑性,将真正适合于“一次开庭审结”的案件纳入程序,更需要通过在小额诉讼中试点略式强制答辩等制度整理和固定审前攻击防御方法,与此同时也需要强化法官在小额诉讼程序中的“监护”和“教示”功能,贯彻特殊化的庭审规则,以实现我国小额诉讼制度的应有价值和独特功能。
Whether the concluded in one court session can be indeed implemented in China’s small claims needs to follow the internal mechanism of the civil procedure law. More importantly, it needs to comply with small claims’ unique procedural ideas and rules. The conclusion of a court session should be based on the comprehensive action of multidimensional procedural elements such as the procedural characteristics of small claims’ procedure, the nature of the case, relevant procedures, and system support. On the premise of ensuring the trial quality, the case can reach the state of "being mature enough to make a judgment" based on one court session. It requires the court to be modesty to bring the cases that are suitable for " concluded in one court session" into the procedure when applying the small claims. It is more necessary to sort out and fix the pre-trial attack defense methods through the test of simplified compulsory defense in small claims. At the same time, it is also necessary to strengthen the "guardianship" and "teaching" functions of judges in small claims procedures and implement special court rules to realize the due value and unique function of China’s small claims system.
出处
《法治研究》
CSSCI
2022年第3期126-134,共9页
Research on Rule of Law
基金
2017年度北京市社科基金青年项目“京津冀协同发展下的跨行政区划法院体制研究”(项目编号:17FXB012)
2018年国家社会科学基金重大项目“民事司法智能化设计的理论方案研究”(项目编号:18ZDA142)阶段性成果。
关键词
小额诉讼
一次开庭审结
审前程序
强制答辩
在线诉讼
small claims
concluded in one court session
pre-trial procedures
compulsory defense
online litigation
