摘要
目前,标准必要专利相关的禁诉令判决已成为各国争议的焦点,但是禁诉令本身并非冲突与对抗的起因,而是各国专利法政策分歧的重要体现。在贸易对话因全球化影响而遭遇困难时,禁诉令是对话路径的自然拓展,或有利于观点的交流和共识的形成。我国禁诉令判决的目的在于维护专利权人与标准实施人双方平等的许可谈判秩序。我国司法机关的做法也符合WTO规则的透明度要求。在多边经贸规则体系风雨飘摇的当下,全球治理面临重大和紧迫任务,各国应该把有限的资源用在更有价值的地方。将禁诉令本身作为国际规则讨论的对象,无益于专利法国际规则的完善和发展。WTO框架下的贸易谈判由各成员行政部门所主导,而禁诉令是司法审判中的程序规则。通过WTO机制讨论禁诉令,由于受制于西方三权分立理论,难以达到良好的效果。WTO成员在多边主义框架下的对话应当回归到对专利法基本规则的讨论,注重求同存异,弥合分歧,以求共同发展。
Anti-suit injunction related to standard essential patents has been the focus of international controversy.However,the anti-suit injunction itself is not the cause of conflict and confrontation,but a significant reflection of the differences in patent law policies among countries.Anti-suit injunction is a natural extension of method to open dialogue,when the traditional trade talks faces difficulty due to the influence of globalization.It might be conducive to the exchange of views and the generation of consensus.The purpose of China’s anti-suit injunction relief is to maintain an equality between patent holder and standard implementer in licensing negotiations.The practice of Chinese courts also meets the transparency requirements of WTO rules.At a time when the multilateral economic and trade rule system is in turmoil,global governance is facing major and urgent tasks,and countries should use their limited resources in more valuable places.Making the anti-suit injunction itself the focus of trade talks is not conducive to the development of international rules of patent law.Trade negotiations under the WTO framework are led by administrations of members,while injunctions are procedural rules in judicial adjudication.Discussion of the injunction through the WTO mechanism is difficult to achieve good results due to Western theory of the separation of powers.Dialogue among WTO members within the framework of multilateralism should return to the discussion of the basic rules of patent law,focusing on seeking common ground while reserving differences,bridging differences,and seeking common development.
作者
彭哲
安佰生
PENG Zhe;AN Baisheng(Shandong University;Chinese Academy of International Trade and Economic Cooperation)
出处
《国际贸易》
CSSCI
北大核心
2022年第6期89-96,共8页
Intertrade
基金
国家社科基金重大项目“新形势下我国参与知识产权全球治理的战略研究”(21&ZD164)的阶段性成果。
关键词
禁诉令
标准必要专利
透明度
anti-suit injunction
standard essential patents
transparency
