摘要
随着公共治理任务广度和强度的增加,政府逐渐采用混合治理模式,通过引入市场或社会参与公共治理。但这一模式在增加政府治理资源、提升治理绩效的同时也导致公共治理场域复杂化,使政府不断面临“尽责”还是“守约”的选择难题。本文基于组织分析的新制度主义视角,通过Q市刺桐大桥PPP模式的个案研究,发现混合治理改变了地方政府原有的单一治理场域,在总体上形成行政逻辑、市场逻辑和社区逻辑持续互动的场域结构;不同治理逻辑的差异化要求及冲突导致地方政府的行动空间被限制,但地方政府能够根据场域结构变化主动调整行为策略,具有“情境性自主”的特点。这一现象建立在不同治理逻辑的权力差异和主导逻辑变化的基础上,前者为其提供了内在支撑,后者则为其提供了持续动力,二者为地方政府的“情境性自主”创造了条件。对混合治理复杂效应的深究与思考,能够进一步揭示地方政府应对复杂公共问题的行动逻辑,为理解当下混合治理实践提供一个新视角。
With the increase in the breadth and intensity of public governance tasks,the government gradually adopts a hybrid governance model,and participates in public governance by introducing the market or society.However,while increasing government governance resources and improving governance performance,this model also complicates the field of public governance,making the government constantly faced with the difficult choice of“conscientiousness”or“compliance”.Based on the perspective of new institutionalism in organizational analysis,this paper finds that mixed governance has changed the original single governance field of the local government through the case study of the PPP model of the Citong Bridge in Q City,and has formed a continuous interaction of administrative logic,market logic and community logic on the whole field structure;the differentiated requirements and conflicts of different governance logics limit the action space of local governments,but local governments can actively adjust their behavioral strategies according to changes in field structure,which has the characteristics of“situational autonomy”.This phenomenon is based on the difference of power and the change of dominant logic in different governance logics.The former provides internal support for it,while the latter provides continuous power for it.Both of them create the condition of“situational autonomy”for local governments.In-depth research and thinking on the complex effects of mixed governance can further reveal the action logic of local governments in dealing with complex public issues,and provide a new perspective for understanding the current mixed governance practice.
作者
吴淼
张津
WU Miao;ZHANG Jin(HUST)
出处
《华中科技大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2022年第4期120-128,共9页
Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)
关键词
混合治理
地方政府
多重逻辑
情境性自主
hybrid governance
local government
multiple logics
situational autonomy
