期刊文献+

2种羟基磷灰石复合材料在上颌窦内提升术植骨同期植入种植体中的临床效果

Clinical effects of two different hydroxyapatite bone graft materials during maxillary sinus lifting surgery with bone grafting and simultaneous implantation of implants
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 :比较2种羟基磷灰石复合材料在上颌窦内提升术植骨同期植入种植体中的临床效果。方法 :收集2018年3月—2019年4月蚌埠医学院第一附属医院收治的上颌后牙区种植、骨量不足患者72例,以随机数字表法分为实验组(36例)和对照组(36例),对照组放置羟基磷灰石复合材料,实验组放置纳米羟基磷灰石复合材料。比较2组种植体植入的临床效果、骨增量、骨密度等情况,统计2组术后种植体稳定性及并发症发生情况。采用SPSS 18.0软件包进行统计学分析。结果:实验组24个月的种植体存留率显著高于对照组(P<0.05),实验组术后6个月的牙槽骨骨吸收量显著低于对照组(P<0.05),实验组术后6个月、12个月的种植体牙槽骨骨密度显著高于对照组(P<0.05),实验组术后12个月的种植体稳定系数值显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。2组术后总并发症发生率相比无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论:上颌窦内提升术放置纳米羟基磷灰石复合材料同期植入种植体存留率高,可改善术后骨代谢,增强种植体稳定性,且安全性良好。 PURPOSE: To compare the clinical effects of two different hydroxyapatite bone graft materials in maxillary sinus lifting surgery with bone grafting and implantation at the same time. METHODS: Seventy-two patients with implantation in the maxillary posterior dental area and insufficient bone mass admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College were collected from March 2018 to April 2019, and they were divided into experimental group( n=36) and control group(n=36) by random number table. Patients in the control group used hydroxyapatite composite material, while patients in the experimental group used nano-hydroxyapatite composite material. The clinical effects, bone increment and bone density changes of the two groups of implants were compared, and postoperative implant stability and complications of the two groups were compared. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 18.0 software package. RESULTS: The survival rate of implants in the experimental group was significantly higher than that in the control group at 24 months( P<0.05). Alveolar bone resorption in the experimental group was significantly lower than the control group 6 months after surgery(P<0.05). The bone mineral density of implants in the experimental group was significantly higher than the control group 6 months and 12 months after operation(P<0.05). The implant stability coefficient value of the experimental group was significantly higher than the control group 12 months after operation(P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the total complication rate between the two groups(P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In maxillary sinus lift, the survival rate of nano-hydroxyapatite composite material implanted in the same period is high, which can improve postoperative bone metabolism and increase implant stability with good safety.
作者 刘芳 李振 谢小飞 路晓淼 张容秀 徐丽 张凯 LIU Fang;LI Zhen;XIE Xiao-fei;LU Xiao-miao;ZHANG Rong-xiu;XU Li;ZHANG Kai(Departmentof Stomalology,Firs Affilialed Hospitalof Bengbu Medical College,Bengbu 233004,Anhui Prouincei;Department of Implantology,Nanjing Stomalological Hospital,Nanjing 210018,Jiangsu Province,China)
出处 《上海口腔医学》 CAS 北大核心 2022年第3期265-269,共5页 Shanghai Journal of Stomatology
基金 安徽省科学技术厅攻关项目(1804h08020290)。
关键词 植骨材料 种植体 效果 Bone graft material Implant Effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献41

  • 1Dohan Ehrenfest DM,Rasmusson L,Albrektsson "I". Classification of platelet concentrates: From pure platelet-rich plasma (p-prp) to leucocyte-and platelet-rich fibrin (I-prf). Trends Biotechnol.2009;27(3): 158-167.
  • 2Cochran DL,Buser D,Ten Bruggenkate CM,et al.The use of reduced healing times on iti~ implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched (sla) surface. Clin Oral Implants Res.2002;13(2): 144-153.
  • 3Lindh C,Petersson A, Rohlin M.Assessment of the trabecular pattern before endosseous implant treatment: Diagnostic outcome of periapical radiography in the mandible. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod.1996;82(3):335-343.
  • 4Summers RB.The osteotome technique: Part 3-less invasive methods of elevating the sinus floor. Compendium. 1994; 15(6):698, 700.
  • 5Nedir R,Bischof M,Vazquez L, et al.Osteotome sinus floor elevation without grafting material: A 1 - year prospective pilot study with iti implants.Clin Oral implants Res. 2006; 17(6): 679-686.
  • 6Rosen PS,Summers R,Mellado JR,et al.The bone-added osteotome sinus floor elevation technique : Multicenter retrospective report of consecutively treated patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants.1999;14(6):853-858.
  • 7Palma VC,Magro-Filho O,de Oliveria JA,et al.Bone reformation and implant integration following maxillary sinus membrane elevation: An experimental study in primates.Clin Implant Dent Relat Res.2006;8(1 ): 11-24.
  • 8Lundgren S,Anderson S,Gualini F, et al.Bone reformation with sinus membrane elevation: A new surgical technique for maxillary sinus floor augmentation.Clin Implant Dent Relat Res.2004;6(3): 165-173.
  • 9Hatano N, $ennerby L, Lundgren S. Maxillary sinus augmentation using sinus membrane elevation and peripheral venous blood for implant&#x2010;supported rehabilitation of the atrophic posterior maxilla: Case series.Clin Implant Dent Relat Res.2007;9(3): 150-155,.
  • 10Sohn DS,Kim WS,An KM,et aI.Comparative histomorphometric analysis of maxillary sinus augmentation with and without bone grafting in rabbit.Implant Dent.2010;19(3): 259-270.

共引文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部