摘要
上博楚简《三德》里有“■”、“■”两个形体,过去释读为“没”字,不为定论。从出土文献与传世文献、上下文语境、句式语法、语义搭配、字词关系等多角度进行分析、讨论和梳理,提出这两个形体应释读为“免”字。从楚简文字系统、形体演变等层面讨论了“■”、“■”与楚简里其他“免”系字的关系及其与甲骨文中“■”等形体的关系。
The characters■and■in Three virtues from bamboo slips in Shanghai(上海)museum were used to be interpreted as Mo(没).In this paper,we firstly analyzed in different aspects such as ancient and modern literature,Context of co-text,sentence structure and semantic collocation,and considered this two forms record the same word Mian(免),which should be interpreted and read as Mian(免).Then we discussed the relationship between■,■and other forms of Mian(免)in Chu(楚)bamboo slips from the perspective of the whole character system of Chu(楚)bamboo slips.Furthermore,we investigated the relationship between■,■and the relevant forms in oracle bone inscriptions such as■from the perspective of glyph evolution.
作者
程邦雄
徐清清
CHENG Bang-xiong;XU Qing-qing(Institute of Chinese Language,Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan Hubei 430074,China)
出处
《语言研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2022年第3期1-5,共5页
Studies in Language and Linguistics
基金
国家社科基金重大项目“草创时期甲骨文考释文献的整理与研究”(20&ZD307)
国家社科基金重点项目“《契文举例》及相关文献的整理与研究”(18AYY019)
华中科技大学文科专项“草创时期甲骨文考释文献的整理与研究(重大项目配套)”(2021WKFZZX006)。
关键词
楚简
《三德》
■
免
Chu(楚)Bamboo slips
Three virtues
■
Mian(免)
