期刊文献+

表现性评价:促进素养养成 被引量:125

Performance Assessment: Promoting Competency Development
原文传递
导出
摘要 新修订的义务教育课程方案强调了核心素养作为育人目标的重要地位。在基于核心素养的课程改革背景下,教育评价亟待超越传统纸笔测试,推进表现性评价。表现性评价不仅能检测素养,更重要的是能促进素养的养成。其促进素养养成的功能主要通过创造在真实情境中解决问题的机会、引起学生的积极投入与主动建构、支持学生的自我调节学习来实现。设计促进素养养成的表现性评价包括三个步骤,分别是确定与课程标准匹配的素养目标并将其具体化;设计能够引发素养的表现性任务;开发基于学习进阶的评分规则。而在实施的过程中,需要将表现性评价嵌入课程与教学,确保学生深度卷入评价全过程,收集并充分利用学生素养表现信息来促进教与学。 The newly revised “Curriculum Program of Compulsory Education” emphasizes the importance of core competencies as the goal of education. Against the background of curriculum reform based on core competencies, educational assessment urgently needs to go beyond the traditional paper-pencil test and launch performance assessment. Performance assessment can not only evaluate competencies, but also develop competencies. Furthermore, competencies are developed by creating opportunities to solve problems in authentic contexts, arousing students’ active engagement and construction, and supporting students’ self-regulated learning. There are three steps when designing performance assessment: :(1) determine a competency goal aligned with curriculum standards and concretize it;(2) design a performance task aimed for developing competencies;and(3) develop a scoring rubric based on learning progression. During the process of implementation, it is necessary to embed performance assessment into curriculum and instruction, ensure that students are deeply involved in the whole process of assessment, and collect and make full use of students’ competency performance information to promote teaching and learning.
作者 周文叶 毛玮洁 ZHOU Wenye;MAO Weijie(Institute of Curriculum and Instruction,East China Normal University,Shanghai,200062,China)
出处 《全球教育展望》 CSSCI 北大核心 2022年第5期94-105,共12页 Global Education
关键词 表现性评价 核心素养 义务教育课程方案 performance assessment core competencies Curriculum Program of Compulsory Education
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献22

  • 1皮连生.智育心理学[M].北京:人民教育出版社,1996..
  • 2RM加涅等著 皮连生等译.教学设计原理[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,1999年.p151.
  • 3Hambleton, R K : Advances in Assessment Models and Practices. In D C Berliner, R C Calfee (ed.). (1996). Handbook of Educational Psychology. New York:Simon & Schunster MaCmillan. p. 902.
  • 4Oosterhof, A (2001). Classroom Applications of Educational Measurement. (3^rd.ed. )New Jersey:Merrill Prantion Hall.p.232.
  • 5Borich, G D , Tombari, M L ( 1997 ). Educational psychology.(2^nd. ed. )New York: Longman, p. 429.
  • 6《中国学生发展核心素养》项目组.中国学生发展核心素养(征求意见稿)[R].2016-1-29.
  • 7Ilmi Willbergh. The problems of ‘competence’ and alternatives from the Scandinavian perspective ofBildungf J]. Journal of Curriculum Studies,2015 ,47(3) :335.
  • 8W. Westera. Competences in education: a confusion of tongues[ J]. Journal of Curriculum Studies,2001.33(1) :75 -88.
  • 9Partnership For 21st Century Skills. Framework for 21st Century Learning [EB/OL]. [ 2016 - 04 - 05 ].http://www. p21. org/our-work/p21 -framework.
  • 10OECD. Better Skills,Better Jobs, Better Lives: A Strategic Approach to Skills Policies[ EB/OL]. (2012 -05 -021). [2016 -04 -05]. http://www. oecd-ilibrary. org/education/better-skills-better-jobs-better-lives_9789264177338-en.

共引文献752

同被引文献701

引证文献125

二级引证文献172

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部