摘要
中日学界对仇兆鳌《杜诗详注》的评价往往毁誉参半。将清代以来学者对《杜诗详注》的褒贬之词进行梳理,并进一步结合其成书背景及相关文献考察这些评价允当与否。可知,诸家对《杜诗详注》价值缺陷的指摘有失公允,有必要重新对相关诋毁与称誉重新审视:一是针对《杜诗详注》的引文中含有仇氏杜撰成分的说法,其实,同时代的注释书几乎都存在更改原文的地方,而在明清时期改字解杜风气盛行的背后《,详注》的引文本身也极有可能已经被改字了;二是针对《杜诗详注》的注释含有冗赘、画蛇添足的要素之说,特别在音注方面,之所以令读者感到冗长乏味,与作者本着诲人不倦的启蒙原则是不无关联的;三是针对《杜诗详注》中仇氏频频将其出生地域的发音视作杜甫的中古音的发音的情况,无疑属于仇氏的注杜之失,可从另一个角度来看《,杜诗详注》中存在的大量音注又为我们了解当时所在地域的发音提供宝贵的资料。
Qiu Zhaoao’s Detailed Annotation of Du Fu’s Poems is as much praised as blamedby Chinese and Japanese academic field. This paper sorts out complimentary and derogative comments of scholars on the book since the Qing Dynasty, and further examines whether these evaluations are reasonable or not, based on its writing background and the related literature. It can be seen that the accusations of the value defects of the bookmade by various scholars are unfair, and it is necessary to re-examine the relevant slander and praise. Firstly, the comment that the quotations in the book contain fabricated elements is unjust since in that era, almost all of the commentaries revised the original text and based on the popularity of changing the characters to interpret Du Fu in the Ming and Qing Dynasties, the quotations of the bookmay have been revised. Secondly, the idea that the annotations contain redundant and superfluous elements, especially in the aspect of phonetic annotation, is unfair in that Qiu Zhaoao bore the principle of enlightening readers despite the fact it may cause reader to feel tedious.Thirdly, in Detailed Annotation of Du Fu’s Poems, Qiu frequently regarded the pronunciation of his birthplace as the pronunciation of Du Fu’s medieval pronunciation, which undoubtedly isa mistakein Qiu’s annotation. However, from another point of view,the large number of phonetic annotations in the book also provide us with valuable information for understanding the pronunciation of the region at that time.
出处
《闽南师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
2022年第2期55-60,共6页
Journal of Minnan Normal University:Philosophy and Social Sciences
关键词
仇兆鳌
《杜诗详注》诋毁
称誉
Qiu Zhaoao
Detailed Annotation of Du Fu’s Poems
slander
praise
