摘要
马克思基于社会历史性的方法论原则,揭示出资本主义生产条件下机器作为一般劳动资料与固定资本的辩证统一,表征了机器作为人的本质力量的对象化与资本对工人的剥削的双重维度。马克思围绕“机器的资本主义应用”展开的政治经济学批判超越了机器悖论的理解方式,并指明了消除这一悖论的科学道路。20世纪中期以来,从自动化到数字化,西方理论家面对新技术带来的社会问题,都从马克思的机器论中寻找养分,在破除机器神话的同时,一再彰显出这一理论的强大阐释力和旺盛生命力。
Based on social and historical methodological principle,Marx revealed the dialectical unity of machine as general labor material and fixed capital under the condition of capitalist production,representing the dual dimensions of machine as the objectification of the essential power of man and the exploitation of workers by capital.Marx’s critique of political economy centered on “the capitalist application of machine” transcends the understanding of machine paradox and points out the scientific way to eliminate this paradox.Since the middle of the 20 th century,from automation to digitalization,western theorists have sought nutrients from Marx’s machine theory in the face of social problems brought about by new technology.While dispelled the myth of machine,they have repeatedly demonstrated the powerful explanatory power and vitality of this theory.
作者
朱春艳
高琴
ZHU Chun-yan;GAO Qin(School of Marxism,Northeastern University,Shenyang 110619,China)
出处
《自然辩证法研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2022年第6期102-108,共7页
Studies in Dialectics of Nature
基金
国家社科基金重大项目“新时代中国特色工匠精神的科学传承与创新发展研究”(21ZDA020)
辽宁省社科基金项目“中国马克思主义‘劳动精神’概念的三维审视”(L18BLW037)
东北大学陈昌曙技术哲学发展基金项目“我国工匠精神的历史演进与传承发展研究”(202002)。
关键词
机器论
劳动过程理论
一般智力
解释机器
machine theory
labor process theory
General Intellect
interpretation machine
