摘要
在美国与其亚太盟友的协作下,“印太”成为西方国家安全话语中的焦点议题。美国的欧洲盟友也纷纷跟进,相继出台各自的“印太战略”文件。对“印太战略”的研究也成为学术热点,仅对事实进行陈述和罗列无法有效反映各国推动和实施“印太战略”的深层动机与逻辑脉络,而比较对象数量过多且差异巨大容易影响结果的有效性。本文试图同中求异,对拥有相同权力地位和类属身份特征的英法德三国“印太战略”进行比较,希望借此探讨三国“印太战略”背后深层动机。英国将自身视为“全球领导力量”,从全球战略的角度自上而下地审视和推动区域性的“印太战略”;法国则将自身看作印太“本地成员”,以海外领地为据点向周边辐射式地推动“印太战略”;德国的个体身份被设定为“规范性力量”,内嵌于欧盟、北约等多边机制当中,尽量回避介入战略竞争,聚焦于经贸合作与社会发展等具体议题。当前,在同盟政治与国内政治影响下,包括英法德三国在内的西方国家存在着以意识形态为壑,针对中国的集团化趋势,应当引起中国的重视。
Given the efforts made by the U.S.and its Asia-Pacific allies,the“Indo-Pacific”has become a hotspot in international relations.The European allies followed the U.S.and issued their“Indo-Pacific Strategy”documents respectively.Picturing facts and listing details could not help to explore the comprehensive motivation of these Europe actors hiding in their“Indo-Pacific Strategy”documents.This paper aims to seek differences from similarities by comparing“Indo-Pacific Strategy”of UK,France and Germany which have same power status and identity,trying to bring new sight to the research.The UK regards itself as a“global leadership force”and promotes“Indo-Pacific Strategy”from the perspective of global strategy;France takes itself as a“local member”of the Indo-Pacific,taking its overseas territories as strongholds to influence the surrounding area;Germany sets its identity as a“normative force”embedded in multilateral mechanisms such as the EU and NATO,avoiding the involvement in the strategic competition and focusing on the economy,social development and other specific issues.At present,influenced by alliance politics and domestic politics,UK,France and Germany are taking ideology as their common ground and the trend of forming group to go against China ought to be taken seriously by China.
出处
《印度洋经济体研究》
CSSCI
2022年第4期46-70,157,158,共27页
Indian Ocean Economic and Political Review
关键词
欧洲
印太战略
身份
地缘政治
Europe
Indo-Pacific Strategy
Identity
Geopolitics
