摘要
在低碳经济背景下,为了实现不同合作机制下的供应链协调,以供应商、制造商和零售商组成的三级供应链为研究对象,运用博弈论的方法,求得博弈主体在非合作、成本分担以及协同合作三种机制下的纳什均衡减排策略,并对这三种机制下的均衡结果和利润最优值进行比较。结果表明:在协同合作机制下各博弈主体的碳减排努力程度更高,且产品减排量和利润最优值协同合作决策也均优于非合作和成本分担机制。
In the context of a low-carbon economy, in order to achieve supply chain coordination under different cooperation mechanisms, a three-level supply chain composed of suppliers, manufacturers, and retailers is used as the research object, and the game theory method is used to find that the game subject under the Nash equilibrium emission reduction strategy in the three mechanisms of non-cooperation, cost sharing and coordination and cooperation. The equilibrium results and optimal profit values under these three mechanisms are compared. The results show that under the cooperative mechanism, each game player has a higher degree of emission reduction efforts, and the cooperative decisionmaking of product emission reduction and profit optimal value is also superior to non-cooperative and cost-sharing mechanisms.
作者
聂秀伍
姚金鑫
丁明雷
NIE Xiuwu;YAO Jinxin;DING Minglei(School of Economics and Management,Harbin University of Science and Technology,Harbin 150080,China)
出处
《工业工程》
北大核心
2022年第4期165-172,共8页
Industrial Engineering Journal
基金
国家社会科学基金资助项目(NS130012)
大学生创新创业资助项目(202110214010x)。
关键词
碳减排
微分博弈
三级供应链
carbon missions
differential game
three-level supply chain
