期刊文献+

学术中的理论创新何以发生——以社科期刊为观察介质 被引量:1

How can Theoretical Innovation Occur in Academic Research——Taking Social Science Journals as Mediums of Observation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 当今世界处于不确定性倍增的百年未有之大变局,中国特色哲学社会科学的构建比以往任何时候都更加召唤“理论创新”。由于既有的关于“期刊繁荣与理论创新”的研究大多忽略了对学术生产机制内在逻辑的剖解,使得“理论创新何以发生”的讨论长期处于一种半悬置的状态。换言之,从理论创新的发生逻辑着手,挖掘理论创新中的学术张力,有助于更好地回答理论创新“何以可能”与“何以可为”。一般而言,理论创新的发生取决于大小环境系统的变迁,以及四个变量——历史、实践、技术、知识和一个关键——思想的变化与互动。在如今规模与体量已经相当可观的学术生产中,以社科期刊为观察介质不难发现,其间充斥着学术张力,突出表现为三重问题与两种脱节,并在不同程度上影响着真正的理论创新的发生。针对学术生产中的张力、问题与脱节,推动理论创新的有效路径大致有三条:一是化解逐利与求真之间的学术张力,二是弥合自然科学与社会科学之间的学术缝隙,三是重新组织新媒体时代的学术生产。理论创新的发生并非必然,但亦充满新机,哲学社会科学工作者唯有负重前行、开拓创新。 Today’s world is in a great change that has not been seen in a century with doubled uncertainty,which calls for theoretical innovation more than ever before.Because the existing research on “journal prosperity and theoretical innovation” mostly ignores the analysis of the internal logic of academic production mechanism,the discussion of “how can theoretical innovation occur” has been in a semi suspended state for a long time.Therefore,this paper intends to start with the occurrence logic of theoretical innovation,strive to tap the academic tension in theoretical innovation,and try to answer how to really promote theoretical innovation.Generally speaking,the occurrence of theoretical innovation depends on the changes of large and small environmental systems,as well as the changes and interaction of four variables—history,practice,technology,knowledge and a key variable—thought.In today’s academic production,it is not difficult to find the academic tension,especially the three problems,and two kinds of disconnection,which affect the occurrence of real theoretical innovation to varying degrees.There are roughly three effective ways to promote theoretical innovation.The first is to resolve the academic tension between profit-seeking and truth-seeking,the second is to bridge the academic gap between natural science and social science,and the third is to reorganize academic production in the era of new media.The occurrence of theoretical innovation is not inevitable,but it is also full of new opportunities.The philosophy and social sciences researchers can only move forward with heavy load,explore and innovate continuously.
作者 李梅 Li Mei(Editorial Department of Exploration and Free Views,Shanghai200020,P.R.China)
机构地区 《探索与争鸣》
出处 《山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2022年第5期18-26,共9页 Journal of Shandong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
关键词 理论创新 社科期刊 学术张力 思想动力 学术生产 中国特色哲学社会科学 Theoretical innovation Social science journals Academic tension Power of thought Academic production Philosophy and Social sciences with Chinese characteristics
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献30

  • 1宋常立.中国古代小说的叙述分层[J].明清小说研究,1999(1):121-130. 被引量:6
  • 2张秀兰.发展型社会政策:实现科学发展观的一个操作化模式[J].中国社会科学,2004(6):19-24. 被引量:40
  • 3刘毅强.解放思想永无止境[N].文汇报,2007-07-13.
  • 4卡尔·波普尔.猜与反驳--科学知识的增长[M].上海译文出版社,2001.318.
  • 5A·爱因斯坦,L·英费尔德.物理学的进化[M].上海科技出版社,1962.66.
  • 6马克思恩格斯全集:第41卷[M].人民出版社,1995.203.
  • 7梅朝荣品诸葛亮[M].武汉大学出版社,2007.
  • 8陈吉德.“眼球学术”是一种典型的伪学术[N].科学时报,2007-11-23.
  • 9陈香.学者呼吁读史治史当观大治得失[N].中华读书报,2008-11-12.
  • 10阿诺·汤因比.历史研究[M].刘北成,郭小凌译.上海人民出版社,2005.

共引文献48

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部