摘要
自动驾驶中“电车难题”式的碰撞选择,是在所模拟的法益冲突发生时,对冲突中的个人法益的要保护程度之间的衡量,其实质是有关生命法益的紧急避险。尽管抽象的生命具有绝对价值,无法进行衡量,但根据具体的需要做出碰撞选择的场合中不同主体所处位置不同,对于危险做出的承诺不同,生命法益的应受保护程度理应有所区别。因此基于对自主决定权的尊重,在一方做出承诺的场合,其生命法益的应受保护程度也相应降低,此时可以基于优越利益原则,选择保全应受保护程度较高的生命法益。
Similar to the "trolley problem", the essence of collision selection in autonomous driving is a anecessity about life. First, it simulates the conflict of legal interests, and then measures the degree of protection of legal interests in the conflict of legal interests. Although abstract life has the highest value and cannot be measured, but in a specific conflict of legal interests, the two parties are in different positions and make different commitments to dangers, and their legal interests should be protected differently. Based on the protection of the right of self-determination, when someone makes a commitment, the degree of protection of his legal interests of life is reduced accordingly. At this time, based on the principle of superior interests, the protection of the legal interests of life that should be protected can be chosen to be preserved.
作者
黎宏
丁文焯
Li Hong;Ding wenzhuo
出处
《湖湘法学评论》
2022年第3期80-89,共10页
HUXIANG LAW REVIEW
基金
国家社科基金青年项目:人机共驾模式下刑事责任问题研究(20CFX026)。
关键词
自动驾驶
电车难题
碰撞选择
紧急避险
允许危险
autonomous driving
trolley problem
collision choice
necessity
dangers allowed
