期刊文献+

全国碳市场引入CCER交易及抵销机制的经济影响研究 被引量:11

The economic impacts of introducing CCER trading and offset mechanism into the national carbon market of China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于中国风电及光伏国家核证自愿减排量(CCER)现状及发展趋势,针对CCER供给、抵销和价格形成等关键机制问题,运用电力部门细分的递推动态可计算一般均衡(CGE)模型,模拟了在取消电价补贴的背景下全国碳市场引入风电及光伏CCER交易及抵销机制的经济影响。研究发现:引入CCER交易及抵销机制会降低碳配额交易价格,并缓解取消电价补贴对风电和光伏电力的负面影响,但也会削弱全国碳市场的碳减排效果,且随着CCER供给总量增加这些作用更明显;全国碳市场引入CCER交易及抵销机制后,碳排放强度较高的控排行业将选择购买更多的CCER,其中火电行业是主要的CCER需求方;未来我国如果不放开CCER项目备案审批则风电行业将是主要受益方,而未来适度放开CCER项目备案审批则风电和光伏行业都将从中受益。因此,全国碳市场在引入CCER交易及抵销机制的同时需从紧设置初始碳配额发放量,并可考虑适时重启CCER项目备案审批工作以更好地促进风电和光伏电力的发展,但允许的CCER清缴比例上限应结合碳减排目标合理设定,以避免对全国碳市场产生较大冲击。 Based on current situation and development trend of wind power and photovoltaics Chinese Certified Emission Reduction(CCER)in China,a variety of policy scenarios were set up for CCER supply,offsetting and price formation and other key mechanisms.Under the background of the cancellation of wind power and photovoltaics price subsidies,a recursive dynamic Computable General Equilibrium(CGE)model with distinguished disaggregation in the electric power sector was developed to simulate the economic impacts of introducing wind power and photovoltaic CCER trading and offsetting mechanisms in the national carbon market.The results show that the introduction of wind power and photovoltaic CCER trading and offsetting mechanisms will reduce the carbon quota price and is also beneficial to ease the negative impact of the cancellation of wind power and photovoltaics price subsidies on these two electric power sectors,but it will weaken the carbon emission reduction effect of the national carbon market,and the effects will be more obvious with the increase of the total supply of CCER.After the introduction of wind power and photovoltaic CCER trading and offsetting mechanisms,industries with higher carbon emission intensity will choose to purchase more CCER,among which the thermal power industry will be the main buyer of CCER.If the register and approval of CCER will not be restarted in the future,the wind power industry will be the main beneficiary.However,if the register and approval of CCER can be restarted and its supply continues to increase year by year,both wind power and photovoltaic industries will benefit.Therefore,the total amount of initial carbon quota setting needs to be moderately tight when introducing CCER trading and offsetting mechanisms into national carbon market,China can consider restarting register and approval of CCER projects in the near future,but the upper limit of the allowable CCER settlement ratio should be reasonably set in combination with carbon emission reduction targets in order to avoid a great negative impact on the carbon emission reduction effect of the national carbon market.
作者 张宁 庞军 ZHANG Ning;PANG Jun(School of Environment and Natural Resources,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872,China)
出处 《气候变化研究进展》 CSCD 北大核心 2022年第5期622-636,共15页 Climate Change Research
基金 中国人民大学科学研究基金(中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助)项目成果(20XNL023)。
关键词 全国碳市场 国家核证自愿减排量(CCER) 风电 光伏 可计算一般均衡(CGE)模型 经济影响 National carbon market Chinese Certified Emission Reduction(CCER) Wind power Photovoltaics Computable General Equilibrium(CGE)model Economic impacts
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献29

  • 1王灿,陈吉宁,邹骥.基于CGE模型的CO_2减排对中国经济的影响[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),2005,45(12):1621-1624. 被引量:187
  • 2Bernard A, Fischer C, Fox A. Is there a rationale for output-based rebating of environmental levies'? [J]. Resource and Energy Economics, 2007, 29 (2): 83- 101.
  • 3Bushnell J. Chen Y. Regulation, allocalion, and leakage in cap-and-trade markets for CO,: NBER working paper, 15495 [R/OL]. 2009-11 [2010- 10-15]. hup:/www.nber.org/papers/w 15495.pdl?new window=1.
  • 4[)emailly D, Quirion P. CO: abatement, competitiveness and leakage in the European cement industry under the EU ETS: grandfathering versus output-based allocation [J]. Climate Policy, 2006, 6:93 113.
  • 5Fischer C, Alan K. Outpul-based allocation of emissions permits for mitigating tax and trade interactions [J]. Land Economics, 2007, 83 (4):575 -599.
  • 6袁永娜,石敏俊,李娜,等.碳排放许可的初始分配与区域协调发展[R].北京:小旧科学院慌拟经济与数据科学研究中心,20l1.
  • 7Fischer C. Combining rate-based and cap-and-trade emissions policies [J]. Climate Policy, 2003, 3 (S2): S89- S103.
  • 8Quirion P. Historic versus output-based allocation of GHG tradable allowances: a comparison [J]. Climate Policy, 2009, 9 (6): 575- 592.
  • 9石敏俊,袁永娜,李娜,等.应对气候变化的节能减排政策选择[C]//.范英.温室气体减排的成本、路径与政策研究.北京:科学出版社,2011:152-192.
  • 10Tietenberg T. The tradable-permits approach to protecting the commons: lessons for climate change [J]. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 2003, 19(3):400- 419.

共引文献52

同被引文献165

引证文献11

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部