摘要
《个人信息保护法》第13条第6项与第27条可被视为规制已公开个人信息处理行为的“责任规则”与“财产规则”,二者在适用上的竞合导致已公开个人信息处理行为的合法性判准陷入模糊。已公开个人信息可被划分为意定公开信息与法定公开信息,二者在公开的依据、承载的利益形态、信息主体可施加的控制程度等方面均存在实质差异。这些差异构成了立法对二者区别评价与区别对待的客观基础。依托法经济学上的“卡-梅框架”进行分析,对于意定公开信息,可保持当前以财产规则为主体的制度设计,以信息主体的意思作为认定信息处理行为是否合法的判准;对于法定公开信息,则应当优先适用责任规则,以促成针对此类信息的有效率的“强制交易”。
Articles 13 and 27 of Personal Information Protection Law set up the “liability rule” and “property rule” for the processing of publicized personal information respectively, the confusion of the applicable conditions and boundaries between the two rules has blurred the legality standard of processing publicized personal information again. Publicized personal information can be further divided into intended publicized information and statutory publicized information. There are substantial differences between the two in terms of the basis and ground of publication, the interests carried, and the ability of the information subject to exercise control. They constitute an objective basis for differentiated evaluation and treatment in the law. From the perspective of the C & M Framework, for the intended publicized information, the current system taking the property rules as the core shall be maintained, and the intention of the information subject shall be used as the criterion for determining the legitimacy of information processing behavior;for statutory publicized information, an efficient “compulsory transaction” in this field should be promoted by the rules of responsibility.
出处
《法制与社会发展》
CSSCI
北大核心
2022年第5期210-224,共15页
Law and Social Development
基金
吉林大学“新文科”创新团队项目“生物技术应用人体的伦理与法律问题研究”(2021XWK05)的阶段性成果。
关键词
类型化
意定公开信息
法定公开信息
个人信息
Typology
Intended Publicized Personal Information
Statutory Publicized Personal Information
Personal Information
