期刊文献+

真实世界临床研究证据分级的思考与初步探索 被引量:11

Thinking and exploration for grading real-world evidence
原文传递
导出
摘要 真实世界证据(RWE)的形成、评价及等级的划分,是影响真实世界研究方法深入发展和科学使用的重要因素。本文简要回顾临床医学研究设计等级与证据等级,提出真实世界临床研究证据分级的要点,包括强调内部真实性与外部真实性的综合评价、确定真实世界证据的起评点和使用真实世界证据质量评价方法三个方面;基于国际较为认可的“证据推荐评估、开发与评价分级标准(GRADE)”,结合真实世界证据的分类及特点,形成初步的分级方案,并采用示例对该分级建议进行评价说明。 The formation, evaluation and grade division of real-world evidence(RWE) are bottlenecks restricting the in-depth development and scientific application of real-world study methods. This paper briefly reviewed the design grade and evidence grade of clinical medical research, and proposed the key points of evidence grade of real-world clinical research, including emphasizing the comprehensive evaluation of internal authenticity and external authenticity,determining the "starting point" of real-world evidence, and using the real-world evidence quality evaluation method.Based on the internationally recognized "grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation(GRADE)", combined with the classification and characteristics of real-world evidence, a preliminary grading scheme was formed. An example was given to illustrate the grading suggestion.
作者 费宇彤 柴倩云 夏如玉 金雪晶 FEI Yutong;CHAI Qianyun;XIA Ruyu;JIN Xuejing(Centre for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine,Beijing University of Chinese Medicine,Beijing 100029,P.R.China;Institute for Excellence in Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine,Beijing University of Chinese Medicine,Beijing 100029,P.R.China;Beijing GRADE Center,Beijing University of Chinese Medicine,Beijing 100029,P.R.China)
出处 《中国循证医学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2022年第10期1206-1211,共6页 Chinese Journal of Evidence-based Medicine
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(编号:82074282)。
关键词 真实世界 证据等级 GRADE 分级建议 Real-world Level of evidence GRADE Grading suggestion
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献26

共引文献103

同被引文献215

引证文献11

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部