期刊文献+

国有企业走出公司法的新路径:以《国有资本投资运营公司法》建构为核心 被引量:3

How SOEs Can Be Separated from Company Law:Centering on the Construction of the State-owned Capital Investment and Operation Company Law
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在《公司法》修订的背景下,学界已经意识到对国有企业施行公司制改革并不等同于国有企业必须接受《公司法》的调整,反而应当借助设立特别法的方式将国有企业剥离出《公司法》的调整范围。这类“剥离说”是对于传统的“商事公司说”矫枉过正的反思,但在立论基础上同样陷入与传统观点类似的“从属性出发”建立国有企业与公司种属关系的主观性路径,且与我国的历史实践相违背。在借助法律形式主义与法律工具主义、法律权威与政治权威之间关系演变的分析再度得出剥离国有企业的必然性后,对代表性剥离方案进行系统地审视,发现《公共企业法》方案未能与“国有企业过度商事化”的问题相匹配,无法“撩开国有企业的商事面纱”;而《国有公司法》方案则因国有公司概念的解读困境,不能满足立法中对核心概念的规范性需求,并且可能在立法后对国有企业的国际法地位与公司制改革成果产生不利影响。为实现对传统观点、《公共企业法》方案与《国有公司法》方案的超越,提出以《国有资本投资运营公司法》的建构为核心的全新剥离路径,进而以投资公司与运营公司制度的分立为基本架构,逐次明确各主体间的法律关系、两种公司的权限范围及其治理结构,并借此立法契机初步展望国有资本监管权与国有资本所有权的分离。 In the context of Company Law revising,the academia circle had realized that the corporate reform of SOEs was not equal to force SOEs to accept adjustments of the Company Law.On the contrary,SOEs should be separated from the adjustment scope of the Company Law by means of establishing special laws.This kind of“stripping theory”was a reflection on the overkill of the“commercial company theory”upheld by the traditional viewpoint.However,it also falls into a subjective path on the basis of its arguments,and goes against the historical practice of our country.After analyzing the evolution of the relationship between legal formalism and legal instrumentalism,legal authority and political authority,the inevitability of divesting state-owned enterprises is again drawn.Through a systematic review of the representative divestiture plan,it is found that the“Public Enterprise Law”plan fails to match the problem of over-commercialization of state-owned enterprises.However,the“State-owned Company Law”program cannot meet the normative needs of legislation due to the difficult interpretation of the concept of state-owned companies,and may have an adverse impact on the status of state-owned enterprises in international law and the results of corporate reform.In order to achieve the transcendence of the above point of view,a new stripping path is proposed with the construction of the“State-owned Capital Investment and Operation Company Law”as the core.
作者 王鹤翔 Wang Hexiang
出处 《财经法学》 CSSCI 2022年第6期52-64,共13页 Law and Economy
基金 国家社会科学基金重点项目“创新社会治理背景下社会企业法律规制研究”(18AFX018) 重庆市研究生科研创新项目“《公司法》修改背景下董事会实质化问题研究”(CYB21147)的阶段性成果。
关键词 国有企业 公共企业 国有公司 公司法 国有资本投资运营公司 state-owned enterprise public enterprise state-owned company company law state-owned capital investment and operation company
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献552

共引文献759

同被引文献63

引证文献3

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部