期刊文献+

多参数磁共振成像联合LI-RADS分级在小肝癌中的诊断价值及临床意义 被引量:7

Diagnostic Value and Clinical Significance of Multi-parameter Magnetic Resonance Imaging Combined with LI-RADS Grading in Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨多参数磁共振成像(Mp-MRI)联合肝脏影像报告和数据管理系统(LI-RADS)分级在小肝癌(SHCC)中的诊断价值,以期为临床早期定性诊断、病情控制提供依据。方法选取2016年6月—2019年4月病灶直径≤3 cm的肝脏局灶性病变128例作为研究对象,均行Mp-MRI检查。以病理检查诊断为金标准,评价Mp-MRI、LI-RADS分级单独及联合诊断SHCC的价值。结果LI-RADS分级显示,128例中21例为LR-1,12例为LR-2,16例为LR-3,31例为LR-4,48例为LR-5;以病理检查结果为金标准,SHCC患者增强率(ER)、表观扩散系数(ADC)、最大上升斜率(MSI)、平均强化时间(MET)低于非SHCC患者,脂肪分数(FF)、最大下降斜率(MSD)高于非SHCC患者(P<0.01);Spearman相关性分析显示,ER、ADC、MSI、MET与LI-RADS分级呈负相关(r=-0.497、-0.541、-0.419、-0.528,P<0.01),FF、MSD与LI-RADS分级呈正相关(r=0.506、0.435,P<0.01)。ER、FF、ADC、MSD、MSI、MET、LI-RADS分级诊断SHCC的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.764、0.753、0.756、0.804、0.817、0.813、0.844,联合诊断的AUC为0.926(95%CI:0.866,0.964)。结论Mp-MRI、LI-RADS分级对于SHCC均具有一定的诊断价值,临床可通过二者联合应用进行早期筛查诊断,以制定相应干预方案,改善患者预后。 Objective To investigate the diagnostic value of multi-parameter magnetic resonance imaging(Mp-MRI)combined with liver Imaging Reporting and Data Management System(LI-RADS)grading in small hepatocellular carcinoma(SHCC),in order to provide evidence for early clinical qualitative diagnosis and disease control.Methods A total of 128 patients with focal liver lesions≤3 cm in diameter from June 2016 to April 2019 were selected as research subjects,all of whom underwent Mp-MRI examination.With pathological diagnosis as the gold standard,the value of Mp-MRI and LI-RADS grading alone and in combination in the diagnosis of SHCC was evaluated.Results The LI-RADS grading showed that among 128 cases,21 cases were LR-1,12 cases were LR-2,16 cases were LR-3,31 cases were LR-4,and 48 cases were LR-5.With pathological results as the gold standard,enhancement rate(ER),apparent diffusion coefficient(ADC),maximum slope of increase(MSI)and mean time to enhance(MTE)in SHCC patients were lower than those in non-SHCC patients,and fat fraction(FF)and maximum slope of decrease(MSD)were higher than those in non-SHCC patients(P<0.01).Spearman correlation analysis showed that Mp-MRI parameters ER,ADC,MSI,and MET were negatively correlated with LI-RADS grading(r=-0.497,-0.541,-0.419,-0.528,P<0.01).FF and MSD were positively correlated with LI-RADS grading(r=0.506,0.435,P<0.01).The area under the receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve(AUC)of ER,FF,ADC,MSD,MSI,MET,and LI-RADS grading for the diagnosis of SHCC was 0.764,0.753,0.756,0.804,0.817,0.813,and 0.844,respectively.The AUC for combined diagnosis was 0.926(95%CI:0.866,0.964).Conclusion Mp-MRI and LI-RADS grading have certain diagnostic value for SHCC,and they can be used in combination for early screening and diagnosis,so as to formulate corresponding intervention programs and improve the prognosis of patients.
作者 崔潇 崔冰 CUI Xiao;CUI Bing(Department of Radiology,the First Hospital of Handan City,Handan,Hebei 056002,China;Department of Clinical Laboratory,the First Hospital of Handan City,Handan,Hebei 056002,China)
出处 《临床误诊误治》 CAS 2022年第11期54-58,共5页 Clinical Misdiagnosis & Mistherapy
基金 河北省卫生健康委科研基金项目(20200438)。
关键词 肝癌 多参数磁共振成像 肝脏影像报告和数据管理系统 表观扩散系数 平均强化时间 诊断价值 Liver cancer Multi-parameter magnetic resonance imaging Liver imaging reporting and data management system Apparent diffusion coefficient Average strengthening time Diagnostic value
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

二级参考文献194

  • 1何晓博,何咏竞,李鹏平,徐信,陈博,曹国栋,熊茂明.葡萄糖氧化酶介导的抗癌疗法[J].肿瘤,2020,40(2):146-152. 被引量:3
  • 2常颜信,刘虎,刘凯,杨家和,岳海燕.原发性肝癌脑转移的诊断与治疗[J].中华转移性肿瘤杂志,2019(2):38-40. 被引量:4
  • 3陈嵩,郭文波,吴志强,庄文权,蔡鸿杰,王帆.肝动脉灌注化疗联合免疫靶向治疗晚期肝细胞癌的临床疗效[J].中华消化外科杂志,2021,20(S02):32-36. 被引量:2
  • 4International Agency for Research on Cancer,World Health Or ganization (WHO). Glohocan 20]2: estimated incidence, mortali ty and prevalence worldwide in 2012EEB/OL. http://glohocan. iarc. fr/Pages/fact_sheets_cancer. aspx,2014-11-1/2015-1-1.
  • 5American College of Radiology. Liver imaging reporting and data system [EB/OL]. http://www, acr. org/QoalitySafety/Re sources/LIRADS,2015 4 27/2015-9-2.
  • 6Tejeda-maldonado J, Garcia-juclrez I, Aguirre valadez J, et al. Diag nosis and treatment of hepatoeellular carcinoma.- an update [J]. World J Hepatol,2015,7(3) :362 376.
  • 7Reiner BI. Medical imaging data reconciliation, Part 4:reconcilia tion of radiology reports and clinical outcomes data[J]. JACR, 2011,8(12) :858-862.
  • 8Darnell A, Forner A, Rimola J, et al. Liver imaging reporting and data system with MR imaging evaluation in nodules 20mm or smaller detected in cirrhosis at screening US[J]. Radiology, 2015, 275(3) 698-707.
  • 9Petruzzi N, Mitchell D, Guglielmo F, et al. Hepatocellular carcino- ma likelihood on MRI exams: evaluation of a standardized catego rization system[J]. Acad Radiol,2013,20(6):694 698.
  • 10Zhang Y,Zhu F,Xu X,et al. Classifying CT/MR findings in pa tients with suspicion of hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison o liver imaging reporting and data system and criteria free likert scale reporting models[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2015,26. DOI 10. 1002/jmri. 24987. [Epub ahead of printS.

共引文献481

同被引文献61

引证文献7

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部