期刊文献+

沙库巴曲缬沙坦治疗射血分数降低的慢性心力衰竭的临床效果观察

Clinical observation on Sacubatrovalsartan on chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:观察沙库巴曲缬沙坦治疗射血分数降低的慢性心力衰竭的临床效果。方法:选取2020年6月—2021年12月中山大学附属第三医院粤东医院收治的慢性射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者115例,按照随机数字表法分为对照组(n=59例),观察组(n=56例)。对照组仅采用常规治疗,观察组在对照组的基础上口服沙库巴曲缬沙坦片。对比两组治疗前及治疗后6个月左心室射血分数(LVEF)改善情况以及测定血浆N末端脑钠肽前体(NT-proBNP)、超敏C反应蛋白(hs-CRP)、肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)、6 min步行距离(6MWT)水平的变化。结果:观察组总有效率(83.93%)高于对照组(69.49%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗6个月后,两组的NT-proBNP、hs-CRP、TNF-α均较治疗前降低,LVEF较治疗前升高,且观察组上述指标改善情况优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组的SMWT较治疗前增高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),观察组6MWT长于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组不良反应发生率(12.5%)低于对照组(13.5%),但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:沙库巴曲缬沙坦治疗射血分数降低的慢性心力衰竭的临床疗效较好,且具有安全性。 Objective Clinical efficacy of Sacubatrovalsartan in the treatment of chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.Methods A total of 115 patients with heart failure with reduced chronic ejection fraction from the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from June 2020 to December 2021 were enrolled and divided into control group(n=59 cases)and observation group(n=56 cases)according to the random number table method.The control group was treated only with conventional treatment,and the observation group took oral Sacubatrovalsartan tablets on the basis of the control group.The improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF)before treatment and 6 months after treatment and the determination of plasma N-terminal brain natriuretic peptide precursor(NT-proBNP),hypersensitivity C-reactive protein(hs-CRP),tumor necrosis factor-α(TNF-α),and 6-minute walking distance(6MWT)levels were compared between the two groups.Results The total effective rate of the observation group(83.93%)was higher than that of the control group(69.49%),and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).After 6 months of treatment,the NT-proBNP,hs-CRP and TNF-αof the two groups were lower than before treatment,LVEF was higher than that before treatment,and the improvement in the observation group was better than that in the control group,with a statistically significant difference(P<0.05),the 6WMT in the two groups was higher than that of before treatment,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05),the observation group 6MWT was longer than the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05),and the incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group(12.5%)was lower than that of the control group(13.5%),and the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05).Conclusion Sacubatrovalsartan has a good clinical efficacy and safety profile in the treatment of chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.
作者 李建明 罗诗韵 谢志辉 LI Jianming;LUO Shiyun;XIE Zhihui(Department of Cardiovascular District 1,East Guangdong Hospital of The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat sen University,Meizhou,Guangdong 514000,China;Department of Internal Medicine,Meizhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Meizhou,Guangdong 514000,China)
出处 《医药前沿》 2022年第30期20-23,27,共5页 Journal of Frontiers of Medicine
关键词 射血分数低下 心力衰竭 沙库巴曲缬沙坦 炎症因子 心功能 Low ejection fraction Heart failure Sacubatrovalsartan Inflammatory factors Cardiac function
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献77

  • 1托伐普坦临床研究协作组,张健,朱文玲.常规治疗基础上联用托伐普坦片治疗心原性水肿的有效性和安全性的多中心随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究[J].中华心力衰竭和心肌病杂志(中英文),2017,1(1):15-21. 被引量:26
  • 2中华医学会心血管病学分会心力衰竭学组,中国医师协会心力衰竭专业委员会,中华心血管病杂志编辑委员会,杨杰孚,张健,韩雅玲.中国心力衰竭诊断和治疗指南2018[J].中华心力衰竭和心肌病杂志(中英文),2018,2(4):196-225. 被引量:834
  • 3慢性阻塞性肺疾病诊治指南(2007年修订版)[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志,2007,30(1):8-17. 被引量:8235
  • 4Balke B. A simple field test for the assessment of physical fitness. CARl Report.1963;63:18.
  • 5AI Ameri HF. Six minute walk test in respiratory diseases: A university hospital experience. Ann Thorac Med. 2006; 1:16-9.
  • 6Enright PL, Sherrill DL. Reference equations for the six-minute walk in healthy adults. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 1998;158(5 Pt 1):1384-1387.
  • 7Celli BR, Cote CG, Marin JM, et al. The body-mass index, airflow obstruction, dyspnea, and exercise capacity index in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med. 2004;350: 1005-1012.
  • 8Guyatt, G, Pugstey, S, Sullivan, M, et al. Effect of encouragement on walking test performance. Thorax. 1984;37: 818-822.
  • 9Casanova C, Cote CG, Marin JM, et al. The 6-min walking distance: long-term follow up in patients with COPD. Eur Respir J. 2007; 29: 535-540.
  • 10Chatterjee AB, Rissmiller RW, Meade K, et al. Reproducibility of the 6-minute walk test for ambulatory oxygen prescription. Respiration. 2010;79(2):121-127.

共引文献5983

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部