摘要
《个人信息保护法》第26条在法律层面上,首次对图像采集设备的安装设定严苛的合法性依据。图像采集设备的安装,不仅构成个人信息处理行为,还因部分个人信息之上承载人格利益,同时受到《民法典》人格权编,尤其是其中肖像权和隐私权规则的规范。两部法律在合法性判定上标准不同,被《民法典》评价为合法的行为极大可能被《个人信息保护法》第26条所禁止。人脸识别技术对个人信息权益存在较大的潜在加害风险,故人脸识别设备之安装应当直接适用《个人信息保护法》第26条。对于其他类型图像采集设备之安装,应当宽松解释《个人信息保护法》第72条的“私人事务例外规则”,构成私人事务的,排除《个人信息保护法》第26条的适用,依据《民法典》隐私保护路径判定其合法性:引入“公共空间的合理隐私期待”新型隐私观念,并于个案中衡量安装者对立利益。
Article 26 of the Personal Information Protection Act sets out for the first time at the legal level a strict basis for the legality of the installation of image capture devices.The installation of image capture devices not only constitutes an act of personal information processing,but is also regulated by the personality rights section of the Civil Code,especially the portrait rights and privacy rules,as some personal information carries personality interests.The two laws have different standards for judging the legality,and the behavior evaluated as legitimate by the Civil Code is likely to be prohibited by Article 26 of the Personal Information Protection Act.Face recognition technology poses a greater potential risk of harm to the rights and interests of personal information,and therefore the installation of face recognition equipment should be directly governed by Article 26 of the Personal Information Protection Act.For the installation of other types of image capture devices,the“exception rule for private affairs”in Article 72 should be interpreted loosely.The new notion of privacy is introduced and the opposing interests of the installer are weighed in each case.
作者
杨芳
郭宏璟
YANG Fang;GUO Hongjing(Law School,Hainan University,Haikou 570228,China)
出处
《重庆邮电大学学报（社会科学版）》
2022年第6期55-63,共9页
Journal of Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications(Social Science Edition)
基金
国家社科基金项目:企业间数据竞争法律问题研究(20BFX121)
互联网法治研究院(杭州)2021年度互联网法治重点研究课题。
关键词
图像采集设备
公共区域
隐私权保护
私人事务例外规则
image capture equipment
public areas
privacy protection
exception rule for private affairs
