期刊文献+

大学生体重污名量表的编制 被引量:2

Development of the Weight Stigma Scale for College Students
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:编制大学生体重污名量表(C-WSS)并检验其效度和信度。方法:选取50名大学生进行开放式访谈,编制初始量表条目;选取599名大学生用于探索性因子分析;选取600名大学生用于验证性因子分析、效标效度检验和内部一致性信度分析,其中42名大学生在间隔2周后进行重测;使用身体意象量表(BIS)、进食障碍量表(EDI-1)的求瘦倾向分量表为效标工具。结果:C-WSS有18个条目,包含情绪体验、认知评价、行为举动3个维度,模型拟合指数良好(χ^(2)/df=3.08,RMSEA=0.06,CFI=0.94,TLI=0.93);C-WSS总分及各维度得分与BIS、EDI-1求瘦倾向分量表得分均呈正相关(ICC=0.63~0.85,均P<0.05)。总量表的Cronbachα系数为0.94,3个维度的Cronbachα系数为0.90、0.86、0.81;总量表的重测信度(ICC)为0.84,3个维度的ICC值为0.86、0.71、0.75。结论:本研究编制的大学生体重污名量表具有良好效度和信度,可用于测量大学生对肥胖体型的消极态度与歧视行为倾向。 Objective:To develop the Weight Stigma Scale for College Students(C-WSS).Methods:Fifty college students were selected and open-ended interviewed for the development of initial version of the C-WSS.The first version was delivered to 599 college students,for item analysis and exploratory factor analysis.Another 600 college students were recruited for confirmatory factor analysis and internal consistency reliability analysis,and were assessed with the Body Image Scale(BIS),drive for thinness subscale of Eating Disorder Inventory(EDI-1)for criteria validity.Forty-two college students were retested 2 weeks later for test-retest reliability analysis.Results:The C-WSS contained 18 items including 3 dimensions(e.g.,emotional response,cognitive evaluation and behavioral behaviors)among college students.The 3-factor measurement model fitted the data well(χ^(2)/df=3.08,RMSEA=0.06,CFI=0.94,TLI=0.93).In addition,both the total and the 3 dimensions scores were positively associated with the scores of the BIS and drive for thinness subscale of EDI-1(ICC=0.63-0.85,Ps<0.05).The Cronbachαcoefficients of the total scale and each dimension were 0.81-0.94,and the test-retest reliability coefficients(ICC)were 0.71-0.86.Conclusion:The C-WSS has good validity and reliability,which could be used to assess negative weight-related attitudes towards overweight and obese persons.
作者 陈浩 吴玉芳 叶一舵 CHEN Hao;WU Yufang;YE Yiduo(College of Public Affaires,Fujian Jiangxia University,Fuzhou 350108,China;School of Economics and Management,Ningde Normal University,Ningde 352201,Fujian Province,China;School of Psychology,Fujian Normal University,Fuzhou 350107,China)
出处 《中国心理卫生杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2023年第2期179-184,共6页 Chinese Mental Health Journal
关键词 体重污名 效度 信度 大学生 weight stigma validity reliability college students
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献57

  • 1陈薇,Freedom Leung,王建平,Carol Wai-yeeTang.香港华人少女进食障碍问卷的信度、效度与常模[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2005,13(1):33-36. 被引量:27
  • 2李立明,饶克勤,孔灵芝,姚崇华,向红丁,翟凤英,马冠生,杨晓光,中国居民营养与健康状况调查技术执行组.中国居民2002年营养与健康状况调查[J].中华流行病学杂志,2005,26(7):478-484. 被引量:1783
  • 3王鹏.神经性厌食症10例临床分析[J].中华精神科杂志,1999,32(1).
  • 4Puhl R M,Heuer C A.The stigma of obesity:a reviewand update[J]].Obesity,2009,17:941-964.
  • 5Huizinga M M,Bleich S N,Beach M C,Clark J M,Cooper L A.Disparity in physician perception of pa-tients,adherence to medications by obesity status[J].0besity,2010,18:1932-1937.
  • 6Allison D B,Basile V C,Yuker H E.The measurementof attitudes toward and beliefs about obese persons[J].Int J Eat Disord,1991,10:599-607.
  • 7Harvey E L,Summerbell C D,Kirk S F,Hill A J.Dieti-tians' views of overweight and obese people and repor-ted management practices[J].J Hum Nutr Dietet,2002,15:331-347.
  • 8Puhl R M,Brownell K D.Confronting and coping withweight stigma j an investigation of overweight and obeseadults[J].ObesityCSilver Spring),2006,14:1802-1815.
  • 9Carels R A,Musher-Eizenman D R.Individual differencesand weight bias:do people with an anti*fat bias have a pro-thin bias?[J].Body Image,2010,7:143-148.
  • 10Swami V,Pietschnig J,Stieger S,Tovee M J,VoracekM.An investigation of weight bias against women andits associations with individual difference factors[J].Body Image,2010,7:194-199.

共引文献87

同被引文献15

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部