摘要
文章运用AHP-EW组合权重优化模型,测算2008—2018年我国沿海11个省份海洋经济高质量发展水平,以全国、三大海洋经济圈以及沿海11个省份等不同层次空间尺度为视角,全面描述我国区域海洋经济高质量发展水平的空间差异及动态演进趋势。结果表明:(1)2008—2018年我国区域海洋经济高质量发展水平整体呈波动上升态势,且地区间差异呈先缩小后小幅扩大的态势。(2)研究期内我国区域海洋经济高质量发展水平在创新和开放维度差异显著,呈两极分化现象,其余3个维度地区间发展相对较为均衡。(3)依据系统聚类分析原理,进一步将沿海11个省份按梯队划分成引领型(上海、广东)、短板型(天津、山东、江苏)、追赶型(浙江、辽宁、福建、海南)和落后型(广西、河北)4种海洋经济高质量发展类型区。
This paper uses AHP-EW combined weight optimization model to measure the high-quality development level of marine economy in 11 coastal provinces of China from 2008 to 2018,and comprehensively describes the spatial difference and dynamic evolution trend of the high-quality development level of regional marine economy in China from the perspective of different spatial scales of the whole country,three marine economic circles and 11 coastal provinces.The results are as follows:(1)From 2008 to 2018,the level of high-quality development of regional marine economy showed an overall trend of increase in fluctuations,and the regional differences showed a trend of decreasing first and then slightly expanding.(2)During the study period,the high-quality development level of regional marine economy varies significantly in the dimensions of innovation and openness,showing a polarization phenomenon,and the development of the other three dimensions is relatively balanced among regions.(3)According to the principle of systematic cluster analysis,11 coastal provinces are further divided by echelon into four types of high-quality marine economic development areas:leading type(Shanghai,Guangdong),weakness type(Tianjin,Shandong,Jiangsu),catch-up type(Zhejiang,Liaoning,Fujian,Hainan)and backward type(Guangxi,Hebei).
作者
仇荣山
殷伟
韩立民
Qiu Rongshan;Yin Wei;Han Limin(Management College,Ocean University of China,Qingdao Shandong 266100,China;Institute of Marine Development,Ocean University of China,Qingdao Shandong 266100,China)
出处
《统计与决策》
CSSCI
北大核心
2023年第1期103-108,共6页
Statistics & Decision
基金
国家社会科学基金重大项目(21&ZD100)
中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(202061038)。
关键词
区域海洋经济
高质量发展
五大发展理念
核密度估计
regional marine economy
high-quality development
five concepts for development
kernel density estimation
