摘要
临床药师参与1例既往有碘对比剂中-重度过敏反应史的左下肢动脉硬化闭塞症并坏疽患者的药学实践,权衡碘对比剂造影下的血管介入治疗与高过敏反应风险的利弊,协助医生制定碘对比剂过敏反应预防方案,为既往发生过碘对比剂重度过敏反应但具有需要介入治疗指征的患者的治疗结局发挥重要作用。
Clinical pharmacists performed pharmaceutical practice for a patient with left lower extremity arteriosclerosis occlusions and gangrene who had a history of moderate to severe allergic reactions to iodine contrast agents. Clinical pharmacists weighed the advantages and disadvantages of vascular intervention with iodine contrast agents and the risk of high allergic reactions, and assisted doctors in formulating the prevention plan for allergic reactions to iodine contrast agents. The practice plays an important role in the treatment outcome of patients with experienced severe allergic reactions to iodine contrast agents while have indications for interventional therapy.
作者
黄海英
Huang Haiying(Department of Pharmacy,Liuyang People's Hospital,Changsha 410300,China)
出处
《中国药师》
CAS
2022年第11期1993-1996,共4页
China Pharmacist
关键词
动脉硬化闭塞
碘对比剂
过敏
临床药师
Arteriosclerosis occlusion
Iodine contrast agent
Allergy
Clinical pharmacists
