期刊文献+

江淮流域梅雨过程识别及梅雨期分级降水时空特征 被引量:3

Identification of Meiyu process and spatiotemporal characteristics of different precipitation levels during the Meiyu period over the Yangtze-Huai River Basin
原文传递
导出
摘要 在全球气候变化背景下,近60 a江淮流域梅雨特征量及梅雨期分级降水的时空变化特征还不明晰。论文采用江淮流域1961—2020年239个气象站逐日降水、气温和NCEP/NCAR再分析资料识别梅雨过程,研究梅雨入出梅日期等特征量及梅雨期不同量级的雨日数等指标的时空特征,计算城市化对梅雨期强降水的贡献。结果表明:Ⅰ区(江南区)平均入出梅最早,Ⅱ区(长江中下游区)次之,Ⅲ区(江淮区)入出梅最晚,梅雨期长度依次为30、30和24 d,入出梅日和梅雨期长度趋势性均不明显。Ⅰ区平均梅雨雨强最大(367.6 mm),Ⅱ区次之(298.4 mm),Ⅲ区最小(253.5 mm);Ⅱ区梅雨雨强显著增加、平均梅雨强度指数最大,最易发生暴力梅,Ⅲ区梅雨强度指数变化最剧烈。江淮流域梅雨量Ⅰ、Ⅱ区中部较大,Ⅰ区雨日数最多,Ⅱ区次之,Ⅲ区最少。梅雨期小雨日数最多、降水发生率最高,中雨、大雨和暴雨依次减少。绝大多数站点小雨、中雨日数趋势性不明显,Ⅱ区中东部大雨、暴雨日数显著增加。绝大多数站点大雨、暴雨降水发生率趋势性不明显,Ⅱ区较多站点小雨、中雨发生率显著下降是其东部梅雨期降水发生率显著减少的原因。暴雨量占梅雨量比例最大、降水贡献率也最大,大雨、中雨和小雨依次减小。Ⅰ、Ⅱ区东部站点大雨、暴雨量显著增加是该区梅雨量显著增加的原因。绝大部分站点的不同量级降水贡献率趋势性不明显,只有Ⅱ区中东部17个站点小雨、中雨贡献率显著降低。城市化加剧了强降水指标上升,城市化对R95P和R99P的贡献率分别为10.59%和17.39%。研究结果可为江淮流域梅雨期暴雨洪涝事件预警、水旱灾害防御、水资源调度提供参考。 The spatiotemporal characteristics of Meiyu intensity index and different precipitation levels during the Meiyu period over the Yangtze-Huai River Basin are still unclear during recent 60 years under global climate change. This study used observed daily precipitation and temperature data from 239 meteorological stations over the Yangtze-Huai River basin from 1961 to 2020 combined with NCEP/NCAR reanalysis data to identify the Meiyu process and investigate the spatiotemporal characteristics of Meiyu intensity index, the number of rainy days, precipitation amount, precipitation incidence rate, and precipitation contribution rate of different precipitation levels during the Meiyu period, and calculate the contribution rate of urbanization to heavy precipitation indices during the Meiyu period. It aimed to provide references for early warning of rainstorm and flood events, flood and drought disaster prevention, and water resources regulation in the Yangtze-Huai River Basin during the Meiyu Period. The research results show that: The average Meiyu onset date and ending date were the earliest in area Ⅰ(Jiangnan area), followed by area Ⅱ(middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River)and area Ⅲ(Jianghuai area), and the length of the Meiyu period was 30 days, 30 days, and 24 days respectively.There was no obvious trend for onset date, ending date, and length of the Meiyu period. The average Meiyu rain intensity in area Ⅰ was the highest, at 367.6 mm, followed by area Ⅱ at 298.4 mm and area Ⅲ at 253.5 mm;the Meiyu rain intensity index in area Ⅱ showed a significant increasing trend in recent 60 years, and the average Meiyu intensity index was the highest in area Ⅱ. Violent Meiyu are most likely to occur in area II, and the interannual variation of the Meiyu intensity index was the largest in area Ⅲ. Meiyu precipitation amount in the central part of areas Ⅰ and Ⅱ was relatively high, with the highest number of rainy days in area Ⅰ, followed by areaⅡ and the lowest was found in area Ⅲ. During the Meiyu period, the number of light rain days was the largest and the incidence of precipitation was the highest, while the corresponding indices of moderate rain, heavy rain,and rainstorm decreased in turn. The trend of light rain days and moderate rain days was not obvious for most stations, but the number of heavy rain days and rainstorm days in the central and eastern parts of area Ⅱ increased significantly. The trend of the incidence of heavy rain and rainstorm was not obvious for most stations,but the incidence of light rain and moderate rain for many sites in area Ⅱ decreased significantly, which is the reason for the significant decrease of the incidence of precipitation during the Meiyu period in eastern area Ⅱ.Rainstorm amount accounted for the largest proportion of precipitation during the Meiyu period, the contribution rate of rainstorm was also the largest, and heavy rain, moderate rain, and light rain decreased in turn. The significant increasing trend of heavy rain and rainstorm precipitation at the eastern stations in areas Ⅰ and Ⅱ is the reason for the significant increasing trend of Meiyu precipitation in this area. The trend of precipitation contribution rates of different magnitudes of precipitation was not obvious for most stations, and only 17 stations in the central and eastern parts of area Ⅱ showed a significant decreasing trend of the contribution rates of light rain and moderate rain. Urbanization aggravates the increasing trend of heavy precipitation, and the contribution rate of urbanization to R95P and R99P was 10.59% and 17.39%, respectively.
作者 姚飛 杨秀芹 刘慕嘉 张余庆 李华 YAO Fei;YANG Xiuqin;LIU Mujia;ZHANG Yuqing;LI Hua(Key Laboratory of Hydrometeorological Disaster Mechanism andWarning of Ministry ofWater Resources,Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology,Nanjing 210044,China;School of Hydrology andWater Resources,Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology,Nanjing 210044,China;School of Urban and Environmental Sciences,Huaiyin Normal University,Huai'an 223300,Jiangsu,China)
出处 《地理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2023年第1期145-160,共16页 Progress in Geography
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(41907384)。
关键词 梅雨监测指标 降水分级 强降水 江淮流域 Meiyu monitoring indices precipitation classification heavy precipitaion Yangtze-Huai River Basin
  • 相关文献

参考文献29

二级参考文献482

共引文献835

同被引文献80

引证文献3

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部