期刊文献+

越南投资条约改革及启示

Vietnam’s Investment Treaty Reform and Implications
下载PDF
导出
摘要 进入21世纪后,越南吸收世界范围的改革经验,并突出东盟特色,对其投资条约进行了改革,成就显著,但改革的系统性、均衡性、发展性尚有欠缺。中越投资条约或需如是完善:及时终止两国1992年双边投资保护条约及其“日落条款”,明确最惠国待遇条款不适用于第三方条约中的程序及实体性规定,以增强系统性;及时回应投资仲裁实践暴露出来的新问题,扩大投资仲裁庭可受理的投资争端范围,以求取均衡性;为东道国和投资者均设定推动可持续发展的条约义务,以培育发展性。 Since the 21st century, Vietnam has absorbed the reform experience of the world and highlighted its ASEAN membership. It has carried out multiple reforms of its investment treaties and achieved remarkable outcomes, but the Vietnamese investment treaty mechanism is still inadequately systematic, balanced and sustainable. In view of the Sino-Vietnamese investment treaties, some countermeasures may need to be put forward: timely terminate China-Vietnam BIT(1992) and its "sunset clause", and make it clear that its MFN clause is not applicable to the procedural and substantive provisions in the third-party treaty, so as to enhance the systematization;timely respond to the new problems exposed in the practices of investment arbitration, and expanding the scope of investment disputes that can be accepted by the investment tribunal in order to achieve balance;set treaty obligations for both host countries and investors to promote sustainable development, so as to foster development.
作者 魏艳茹 Wei Yanru
机构地区 广西大学法学院
出处 《东南亚纵横》 2022年第5期61-72,共12页 Crossroads:Southeast Asian Studies
基金 国家社会科学基金2018年度一般项目“国际投资规则创新的多元化路径研究”(18BFX215)的阶段性研究成果。
关键词 越南 投资条约 投资仲裁 可持续发展 Vietnam investment treaty investment arbitration sustainable development
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献54

  • 1武燕琼.中国—东盟自由贸易区《投资协议》的法律评析[J].思想战线,2009,35(S2):163-165. 被引量:4
  • 2于向东.冷战后越南对华政策的调整[J].当代亚太,2005(4):60-64. 被引量:7
  • 3ASEAN Secretariat. ASEAN Investment Guidebook 2009[M] ,Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat,2010: 10.
  • 4《中国-东盟投资协议》第2条(目标).
  • 5中国-缅甸BIT第10条.
  • 6中国-新加坡BIT第15条.
  • 7中国-印尼BIT第11条.
  • 8ATA Construction, Industrial and Trading Company v. The Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, ICSID Case No. ARB/08/2.
  • 9Inmaris Perestroika Sailing Maritime Services GMBH and Others v. Ukraine,ICSID Case No. ARB/08/8.
  • 10Giovanna a Beccara and others v. The Argentine Republic,ICSID Case No. ARB/07/5.

共引文献71

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部