摘要
韩国是东北亚地区典型的陆海复合型国家,日本则是东北亚地区唯一的海洋国家。近年来,韩日都加大了对海洋领域的资源投入,两国海洋争端问题也因此日趋凸显。而海洋争端则反过来刺激韩日两国加强海上武装力量建设,这种态势增大了两国间发生军事摩擦的风险。就海军战略比较来说,韩日双方在作战环境、作战对象、舰队结构、兵力构成以及作战理念方面存在较大差异。这种差异造成的影响,使韩日双方的海权矛盾处于相对可控状态,也有可能使美国的“印太战略”加速推进,并对中国人民解放军海军的能力提出了更高要求。就其本质而言,韩日海洋安全战略的差异是其战略定位与战略能力不同所造成的结果,这种差异对于韩日海权矛盾以及东北亚地区海洋战略格局产生的影响是较为长久的。
South Korea is a typical land-sea composite country in Northeast Asia, while Japan is the only maritime country in Northeast Asia. The maritime security strategies of South Korea and Japan has an impact on the strategic pattern of seapower in Northeast Asia. In recent years, both countries have increased resource investment in the marine sector. As an important issue in Korea-Japan relations, maritime disputes have become increasingly prominent.Maritime disputes, in turn, encourage South Korea and Japan to strengthen their maritime armed forces, which increases the risk of military friction between the two countries. In terms of comparison of naval strategies, there are big differences between South Korea and Japan in operational environment, operational objects, fleet structure, troop composition and concept of operation. These differences could lead to a spillover effect, which could accelerate the U. S. Indo-Pacific strategy, and put forward higher requirements for the capabilities of the PLA Navy. In essence, the differences in security strategies between South Korea and Japan are the result of their different strategic positioning and strategic capabilities. Such differences have a long-term impact on the conflict of seapower between South Korea and Japan and the maritime strategic pattern in Northeast Asia.
出处
《亚太安全与海洋研究》
CSSCI
2023年第2期75-90,I0003,I0004,共18页
Asia-Pacific Security and Maritime Affairs
基金
国家社会科学基金重大研究专项(编号:20VGQ013)。
关键词
韩国
日本
海洋安全战略
海军战略
海权
岛屿争端
东北亚
South Korea
Japan
maritime security strategy
naval strategy
seapower
island dispute
