期刊文献+

孰是孰非? 芒福德与雅各布斯人文城市思想比较及其当代价值

Who is Right and Who is Wrong?A Comparison of Lewis Mumford’s and Jane Jacobs’Humanistic Urban Thoughts and Their Contemporary Values
原文传递
导出
摘要 刘易斯·芒福德和简·雅各布斯都是城市规划界的重要人物,同时也是人文主义城市思想的代表,但由于专业背景和研究视角的不同,芒福德与雅各布斯对于田园城市理念,包括城市规模、系统思维、人文观与自然观以及城市规划逻辑等存在较大分歧,特别是在区域式思想和渐进式规划理念上产生了激烈交锋,这种交锋对后续城市规划界也产生了重大影响。本文梳理二人的城市思想理念,同时分析田园城市和现代主义城市两种城市思潮,汲取城市思想精华,总结历史经验教训,对照当前我国城市发展的现状,为当代城市的发展给予建设性指导,阻止城市沦为工业文明的殉葬品。 Lewis Mumford and Jane Jacobs are both important figures in the field of urban planning and representatives of humanistic urban thoughts,but because of their different professional backgrounds and research perspectives,Mumford and Jacobs have great differences in the concept of Garden City,including urban scale,systematic thinking,humanism and nature,as well as urban planning logic.In particular,there has been a fierce confrontation between the idea of‘regional’and the‘progressive’approaches to planning,which has also had a significant impact on the subsequent urban planning scene.This paper compares Mumford’s and Jacobs’s urban ideas,analyzes both the‘Garden City’and‘Modernist City’,to absorb the quintessence of urban thoughts,to summarize lessons of history,and to provide constructive guidance for the development of contemporary cities in light of the current situation of urban development in China.It also provides constructive guidance for the development of contemporary cities and prevents cities from becoming the sacrificial objects of industrial civilization.
作者 孙会 Sun Hui
出处 《国际城市规划》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2023年第1期59-64,99,共7页 Urban Planning International
基金 江苏高校哲学社会科学研究项目(2022SJYB0322) 高水平大学建设项目开放课题(2022ZYWH005)。
关键词 城市思想 人文主义 刘易斯·芒福德 简·雅各布斯 田园城市 埃比尼泽·霍华德 Urban Thoughts Humanism Lewis Mumford Jane Jacobs Garden City Ebenezer Howard
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献89

共引文献374

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部