摘要
历经“三次研究高潮”的中国边疆学产生了一系列纷繁复杂的研究成果,但共享了一个基础语境,即“以现代性为锚”,可视为对现代性的自发性、自觉性或自反性的回应。现代性概念的牵引下,一方面,中国边疆研究和治理确立了议题、内容甚至目标;但另一方面,中国边疆的复杂性也被部分忽视和遮蔽。聚焦于“边疆性”概念的理论研究并结合民族志案例对边疆治理实践的考察,不仅可以简明勾勒出现代性对中国边疆研究和治理的具体锚定,即“国家性”和“一致性”;也能反过来揭示现代性所造成的遮蔽,即“地方性”和“异质性”。由此在深化对中国边疆的复杂主体与复杂体系认知的同时,促成“以边疆性为锚”对现代性内涵的反思。
China’s borderland studies,which have gone through three research peak periods,have produced a series of research results of various kinds,but shared a basic context anchored on modernity,which can be seen as the spontaneous,conscious or reflexive responses to modernity.Driven by modernity,on the one hand,there have been established topics,contents,and even goals in China’s borderland studies and governance;on the other hand,the complexity of China’s borderland has also been partially ignored and obscured.Focusing on the theoretical study of the concept of“borderness”plus the ethnographic cases of borderland governance,this paper not only gives a concise outline of China’s borderland studies and governance anchored on modernity,that is,“nationhood”and“uniformity”,but also reveals the shadows incurred by modernity,namely“locality”and“heterogeneity”.While deepening the cognition of the complex subjects and systems of China’s borderland,it also promotes the reflection on the connotations of modernity anchored on borderness.
作者
刘玺鸿
LIU Xihong(Institute of China’s Borderland Studies,Zhejiang Normal University,Jinhua 321004,China)
出处
《云南师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2023年第2期11-19,共9页
Journal of Yunnan Normal University：Humanities and Social Sciences Edition
基金
国家社会科学基金项目“‘精英阶层’与现阶段我国边疆民族地区稳定研究”(16BMZ011)。
关键词
现代性
边疆性
抵边村
国家性
异质性
modernity
borderness
border village
nationhood
heterogeneity
