期刊文献+

东道国数据保护是否会抑制中国电商跨境并购 被引量:41

Does Personal Data Protection Reduce Cross-Border M&A of Chinese E-Commerce
原文传递
导出
摘要 数字经济时代,大量的经济活动依托数据展开,政府部门的数据管制对企业经营活动,特别是跨区域经营活动产生深远的影响。本文以欧盟《通用数据保护条例》(GDPR)为例,基于SDC数据库2009—2021年中国跨境并购数据,考察个人数据保护对中国电商跨境并购的影响以及潜在机制。研究发现,GDPR显著抑制了中国电商跨境并购,这一结论在考虑一系列可能干扰估计结果的因素后依然成立。动态效应分析发现,GDPR对中国电商跨境并购的影响存在明显的预期效应,GDPR的负面影响始于实施前的3期,从颁布到正式生效,负面影响有所增加。随着对政策的预期趋于稳定,负面影响有所减少,而且GDPR短期的负面效应大于长期的负面效应。基于成本和收益视角的机制分析表明,东道国对数据限制程度和敏感程度越高,东道国电商市场和在线广告业务越发达,GDPR实施对跨境并购的负面冲击越大。这意味着GDPR不仅提高了中国电商企业跨境并购的成本,而且降低了中国电商企业跨境并购能够获得的潜在收益,两方面共同作用下,GDPR显著抑制了中国电商企业的跨境并购。本文的研究丰富了数字经济时代跨境并购的相关理论,为中国数字企业“走出去”提供重要参考。 In the era of the digital economy,a large number of business activities depend on data,while the regulation of data by the government can have a profound impact on business activities,especially cross-border business activities. This paper examines whether and how General Data Protection Regulation(GDPR)impacts China’s e-commerce cross-border M&A and explores the impact of data protection regulations on corporate internationalization.This paper constructs a panel dataset of China’s cross-border M&A for the period 2009—2021 and evaluates the impact of GDPR using a difference-in-differences(DID)methodology. The baseline results of this paper indicate that GDPR inhibits China’s e-commerce cross-border M&A. Then,this paper analyzes the dynamic effects of GDPR via the event study method. The results reveal that the negative impact of GDPR on China’s e-commerce cross-border M&A commenced in 2015 and strengthened between its official enactment in 2016 and its official entry into force in 2018. Thereafter,the negative impact of GDPR decreased. This paper argues that the negative effects of GDPR exhibit some volatility possibly representing the uncertainty of entrepreneurs’ and investors’ expectations of GDPR. In further,this paper also shows that GDPR’s short-term negative effects are greater than its long-term negative effects. Finally,this paper also analyzes the mechanism from the perspective of the costs and benefits of cross-border M&A. The results show that the higher the potential costs of GDPR is,the greater the potential revenue decline caused by GDPR will be,and the greater the negative impact of GDPR on crossborder M&A will be.This paper makes several contributions. First,this paper is the first to examine the impact of data regulations on cross-border M&A,expanding the boundaries of research on cross-border M&A in the digital economy. The impact of personal data protection has not been discussed in either the literature examining the influencing factors of cross-border M&A or the literature analyzing companies’ internationalization strategies. Second,this paper is the first to examine the impact of data protection regulations on the cross-border business of Chinese companies. Existing studies are mainly based on samples from Europe and the United States and are limited to the analysis of e-commerce industry revenue,market structure,and financing. Besides they have not yet addressed the cross-border business of e-commerce companies. Third,this paper innovatively builds an analytical framework for analyzing the impact of GDPR on cross-border M&A from the perspective of costs and benefits. Few studies have analyzed in depth the theoretical mechanisms of the economic effects of data protection regulations.Fourth,causal identification is carried out using changes in policy shocks over time. This paper makes full use of the differences in the time sequence of GDPR policy formulation, enactment, and enforcement,and focuses on the dynamic effects of GDPR,analyzing not only the expected effects of GDPR but also the impacts of GDPR from the short-and long-term perspectives. This has implications for other empirical studies based on the DID method and event study method.This paper provides some policy insights. First,the government should provide companies with adequate and professional information on data legislation around the world to safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese companies overseas. Second,the government can refer to the experience and practices of the European Union(EU)and Japan,and sign agreements with other countries to jointly establish data security circulation zones. Third,the government should draw on the EU’s extraterritorial enforcement practice and strengthen extraterritorial data compliance enforcement cooperation by establishing bilateral enforcement cooperation mechanisms with other countries. Fourth,the government should actively apply for accession to international agreements such as the Digital Economy Partnership Agreement and take the initiative to participate in the formulation of international data rules. Fifth,the government should actively promote the Global Initiative on Data Security and absorb more countries to join this initiative.
作者 马述忠 吴鹏 房超 MA Shu-zhong;WU Peng;FANG Chao(China Academy of Digital Trade,Zhejiang University;School of Economics,Zhejiang Gongshang University)
出处 《中国工业经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2023年第2期93-111,共19页 China Industrial Economics
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目“跨境电商推进我国数字贸易强国建设研究”(批准号71973120)。
关键词 个人数据保护 通用数据保护条例 跨境并购 电子商务 personal data protection General Data Protection Regulation cross-border M&A e-commerce
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献113

共引文献1049

引证文献41

二级引证文献50

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部