摘要
《刑法修正案(十一)》新增危险作业罪,体现了刑法对作为总体国家安全观重要内容之一的生产安全的保护。然而,预防性立法的负面效应、入罪门槛低等问题可能导致该罪处罚范围的不当扩张,因而有必要建构其在司法适用中的出罪路径。对构成要件进行限缩解释,将“生产、作业中”限定于具有常习性、持续性、危险性的特定业务中,以“特定领域标准”为三种法定行为之“现实危险”提供明确的判断依据,能够从实体上厘定该罪的入罪范围。程序上,借助企业合规不起诉的理论和制度,推进生产、作业单位的合规建设,能够实现对合规企业及相关自然人的出罪。
The Criminal Law Amendment(1l)adds the crime of dangerous work,reflecting the protection of production safety as one of the important contents of the overall national security concept by the Criminal Law.However,the negative effects and the low requirements for criminalization of preventive legislation may lead to an inappropriate expansion of the scope of punishment for this crime,so it is necessary to construct its path for criminalization in judicial application.The restrictive interpretation of the constitutive elements limits the"production and operation"to specific businesses with habits,continuity and danger,and provides a clear judgment basis for the"real danger"of the three legal acts with the"specific field standard",which can determine the scope of the crime from the entity.In terms of procedure,we should learn from the theory and system of non-prosecution of enterprise compliance,promote the compliance construction of production and operation units,and realize the decriminalization of compliance enterprises and related natural persons.
作者
苏青
晏声扬
Su Qing;Yan Shengyang(Xi'an Jiaotong University,Xi'an Shanxi 710049)
出处
《警学研究》
2023年第1期75-83,共9页
Police Science Research
关键词
危险作业罪
出罪路径
限缩解释
合规不起诉
dangerous operation crime
decriminalization path
restrictive interpretation
non-prosecution of compliance
