期刊文献+

载药栓塞微球经肝动脉化疗栓塞术联合阿帕替尼治疗不可切除肝癌后二线追加卡瑞利珠单抗的安全性和有效性分析 被引量:10

Safety and efficacy of camrelizumab added to second-line therapy after drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization combined with apatinib for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析在载药栓塞微球经肝动脉化疗栓塞术(DTACE)联合阿帕替尼治疗不可切除肝癌后,二线追加卡瑞利珠单抗的安全性和有效性。方法回顾性分析2019年12月—2020年12月于郑州大学第一附属医院就诊的89例二线追加卡瑞利珠单抗的肝癌患者资料。主要观察终点是使用卡瑞利珠单抗后总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS),次要终点包括客观缓解率(ORR)、疾病控制率(DCR)和治疗相关不良事件(TRAE)。采用Kaplan-Meier法估算生存曲线,基线特征亚组分层分析采用Log-rank检验进行比较,分析影响患者预后的相关因素。结果本研究共筛选并随访了89例患者。随访至2021年12月,中位随访时间为16个月,中位OS为17.0(95%CI:15.3~18.7)个月,中位PFS为7.0(95%CI:6.2~7.8)个月。不同ECOG-PS、肝功能Child-Pugh分级、门静脉侵犯、进展模式、DTACE次数、口服阿帕替尼时长和应用卡瑞利珠单抗时长的患者OS及PFS之间差异具有统计学意义(P值均<0.05)。应用卡瑞利珠单抗后3个月与6个月ORR分别为39.3%和22.4%,DCR分别为80.9%和54.1%。Log-rank检验单因素分析结果表明:DTACE次数为3~4、1~2比0次的患者显著改善中位OS[22.0(95%CI:21.1~22.9)个月vs 17.0(95%CI:15.8~18.2)个月vs 10.0(95%CI:7.0~13.0)个月,χ^(2)=31.423,P<0.001]与PFS[10.0(95%CI:7.0~13.0)个月vs 7.0(95%CI:6.2~7.8)个月vs 3.0(95%CI:1.9~4.1)个月,χ^(2)=20.741,P<0.001];阿帕替尼应用时长>4个月比≤4个月的患者显著改善中位OS[21.0(95%CI:19.1~22.9)个月vs 14.0(95%CI:10.4~17.6)个月,χ^(2)=19.399,P<0.001]与PFS[9.0(95%CI:7.3~10.7)个月vs 5.0(95%CI:4.0~6.0)个月,χ^(2)=27.733,P<0.001];卡瑞利珠单抗应用时长>5个月比≤5个月的患者显著改善中位OS[22.0(95%CI:20.2~23.8)个月vs 13.0(95%CI:9.3~16.7)个月,χ^(2)=22.336,P<0.001]与PFS[9.0(95%CI:7.0~11.0)个月vs 5.0(95%CI:4.1~5.9)个月,χ^(2)=26.141,P<0.001]。DTACE术后不良事件为栓塞后综合征,给予对症处理后缓解。靶向药物和免疫治疗相关不良反应经对症支持治疗后均缓解,无4级及以上不良反应,无患者因TRAE而停用靶免治疗。结论DTACE联合阿帕替尼治疗不可切除肝癌进展后追加卡瑞利珠单抗疗效确切,TRAE总体安全可控。 Objective To investigate the safety and efficacy of camrelizumab added to second-line therapy after drug- eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization(DTACE)combined with apatinib for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).Methods A retrospective analysis was performed for 89 HCC patients with camrelizumab added to second-line therapy who attended The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from December 2019 to December 2020.The primary endpoints were overall survival(OS)and progression-free survival(PFS)after the application of camrelizumab,and the secondary endpoints were objective remission rate(ORR),disease control rate(DCR),and treatment-related adverse events(TRAEs).The Kaplan-Meier method was used to plot survival curves,the Log-rank test was used for stratified analysis of subgroups based on baseline characteristics,and the influencing factors for prognosis were analyzed.Results A total of 89 patients were screened and followed up in this study.The patients were followed up to December 2021,with a median follow-up time of 16 months,a median OS time of 17.0(95%confidence interval[CI]:15.3-18.7)months,and a median PFS time of 7.0(95%CI:6.2-7.8)months.There were significant differences in OS and PFS between the patients with different ECOG-PS scores,liver function Child-Pugh classes,portal vein invasion,patterns of progression,times of DTACE treatment,durations of oral administration of apatinib,and durations of application of camrelizumab(all P<0.05).At 3 and 6 months after the application of camrelizumab,ORR was 39.3%and 22.4%,respectively,and DCR was 80.9%and 54.1%,respectively.The univariate analysis using the Log-rank test showed that compared with the patients receiving 0 time of DTACE treatment,the patients receiving 3-4 or 1-2 times of DTACE treatment had significant improvements in median OS[22.0(95%CI:21.1-22.9)months and 17.0(95%CI:15.8-18.2)months vs 10.0(95%CI:7.0-13.0)months,χ^(2)=31.423,P<0.001]and PFS[10.0(95%CI:7.0-13.0)months and 7.0(95%CI:6.2-7.8)months vs 3.0(95%CI:1.9-4.1)months,χ^(2)=20.741,P<0.001];compared with the patients using apatinib for≤4 months,the patients using apatinib for>4 months had significant improvements in median OS[21.0(95%CI:19.1-22.9)months vs 14.0(95%CI:10.4-17.6)months,χ^(2)=19.399,P<0.001]and PFS[9.0(95%CI:7.3-10.7)months vs 5.0(95%CI:4.0-6.0)months,χ^(2)=27.733,P<0.001];compared with the patients using camrelizumab for≤5 months,the patients using camrelizumab for>5 months had significant improvements in median OS[22.0(95%CI:20.2-23.8)months vs 13.0(95%CI:9.3-16.7)months,χ^(2)=22.336,P<0.001]and PFS[9.0(95%CI:7.0-11.0)months vs 5.0(95%CI:4.1-5.9)months,χ^(2)=26.141,P<0.001].Post-embolization syndrome was the adverse event after DTACE and resolved after symptomatic treatment.Adverse reactions related to targeted drugs and immunotherapy all resolved after symptomatic supportive treatment,with no grade≥4 adverse reactions,and no patients withdrew from target-free therapy due to TRAEs.Conclusion As for DTACE combined with apatinib in the treatment of unresectable HCC,camrelizumab added after progression has a marked therapeutic efficacy with safe and controllable TRAEs.
作者 张延藏 王满周 韩新巍 段旭华 任建庄 李浩 王文辉 许文泽 ZHANG Yancang;WANG Manzhou;HAN Xinwei;DUAN Xuhua;REN Jianzhuang;LI Hao;WANG Wenhui;XU Wenze(Department of Interventional Radiology,The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou 450052,China)
出处 《临床肝胆病杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2023年第4期834-842,共9页 Journal of Clinical Hepatology
基金 2021年河南省医学科技攻关省部共建重大项目(SBGJ202102100)。
关键词 肝肿瘤 化学栓塞 治疗性 阿帕替尼 卡瑞利珠单抗 Liver Neoplasms Chemoembolization,Therapeutic Apatinib Camrelizumab
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献12

共引文献145

同被引文献106

引证文献10

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部