综合护理模式在重症监护病房急性心肌梗死护理中的应用研究被引量：2

下载PDF

导出

摘要目的探讨综合护理模式在重症监护病房急性心肌梗死护理中的应用效果。方法将我院重症监护病房2020年7月至2022年7月接收的88例急性心肌梗死患者按照Excel随机分组方法分为对照组(给予常规护理干预)与干预组(给予综合护理干预),各44例,观察两组的心理状态变化,比较两组的并发症发生率。结果综合护理干预后,干预组的SAS评分与SDS评分均低于对照组(P<0.05);干预组的并发症发生率为2.27%,显著低于对照组的18.18%(P<0.05)。结论对重症监护病房急性心肌梗死患者在对症治疗同时辅以综合护理干预,能够明显减轻患者不良情绪,降低患者并发症发生率,促进患者心理及生理康复。

作者黄梅

机构地区福建医科大学附属第一医院

出处《心血管病防治知识（学术版）》 2023年第2期87-90,共4页 Prevention and Treatment of Cardiovascular Disease

关键词综合护理干预重症监护病房急性心肌梗死心理状态并发症

分类号 R473.5 [医药卫生—护理学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献16

1康颖,梅蕾,胡宏宇,薛明月,李鑫,李虹.全程专业心理护理个案管理对急性心肌梗死患者康复和生活质量的影响[J].中国临床研究,2020,33(5):716-718. 被引量：55
2李秀英.ICU重症患者实施综合护理干预对患者心理状态、睡眠质量、满意度等效果分析[J].世界睡眠医学杂志,2021,8(1):14-15. 被引量：3
3周露萍.综合护理干预在急性支气管炎患者中的效果研究[J].中国冶金工业医学杂志,2022,39(4):405-406. 被引量：3
4穆群.ICU重症患者进行综合护理干预的应用效果分析[J].中国城乡企业卫生,2021,36(11):213-215. 被引量：3
5杜丹.急性心肌梗死护理模式与并发症发生影响[J].中国医药指南,2021,19(7):148-149. 被引量：2
6蔡成燕,袁余.预见性护理对急性心肌梗死患者心功能和并发症的影响[J].当代护士（中旬刊）,2022,29(2):49-51. 被引量：3
7李聪茹.体位护理对心内科重症监护室中急性心肌梗死早期病人心脏机能、临床转归的影响[J].全科护理,2020,18(26):3492-3494. 被引量：4
8丁丽娜,赵艳.心脏康复护理对急性心肌梗死患者心理状态与并发症的影响[J].中国实用医药,2021,16(24):186-188. 被引量：1
9郑曦.预见性护理对老年长期卧床患者压疮及生活质量的影响[J].中国冶金工业医学杂志,2022,39(4):473-474. 被引量：4
10董慧,马佳牧,和红静,DONG Xiao-hong.综合护理干预措施对重症监护室危重患者下肢深静脉血栓形成的预防效果[J].血栓与止血学,2019,25(2):304-306. 被引量：15

二级参考文献168

1陈淑艳.优质护理在心血管介入治疗患者中的应用疗效探究[J].世界最新医学信息文摘,2019,0(84):278-279. 被引量：3
2张丽,韩芳,李强,朱妍妍.探讨心脏康复护理对老年性心衰患者及急性心肌梗死患者心理状态和并发症的影响[J].健康大视野,2020(1):204-205. 被引量：7
3Roffi M, Patrono C, Collet JP, et al. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: Task Force for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Presenting without Persistent ST-Segment Elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) [J]. Eur Heart J, 2016, 37 (3) : 267-315. DOI: 10. 1016/j. rec. 2015. 10. 009.
4Nabi F, Chang SM, Xu J, et al. Assessing risk in acute chest pain : The value of stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients admitted through the emergency department [ J]. J Nucl Cardiol, 2012, 19 (2): 233-243. DOI: 10. 1007/s12350-011-9484-7.
5Shah BN, Balaji G, Alhajiri A, et al. Incremental diagnostic and prognostic value of contemporary stress echocardiography in a chest pain unit: mortality and morbidity outcomes from a real-world setting [J]. Cardiovasc Imaging, 2013, 6 (2): 202-209. DOI: 10. ll61/CIRCIMAGING. 112. 980797.
6Huhen E, Pickett C, Bittencourt MS, et al. Outcomes after coronary computed tomography angiography in theemergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials [J]. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2013, 61 (8): 880- 892. DOI: 10. 1016/j. jacc. 2009. 02. 008.
7Mueller C, Giannitsis E, Christ M, et al. Multicenter evaluation of a 0-hour/l-hour algorithm in the diagnosis ofmyocardial infarction with high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T [ J ]. Ann Emerg Med, 2016, pii: S0196-0644 (15) 01501-2. DOI: 10. 1016/j. annemergrned. 2015. 11. 013.
8Reichlin T, Schindler C, Drexler B, et al. One-hour rule-out and rule-in of acute myocardial infarction using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T [J]. Arch Intern Med, 2012, 172 (16) : 1211-1218. DOI: 10. 1001/archintemmed. 2012. 3698.
9Steg PG, James SK, Atar D, et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation [J]. Eur Heart J, 2012, 33 (20) : 2569-2619. DOI: 10. 1093/eurheartj/ehs215.
10Fox KA, Fitzgerald G, Puymirat E, et al. Should patients with acute coronary disease be stratified for management according to their risk Derivation, external validation and outcomes using the updated GRACE risk score [J]. BMJ Open, 2014, 4 (2): e4425. DOI: 10. 1136/bmjopen-2013-O04425.