摘要
环境损害司法鉴定是2005年司法鉴定管理体制改革以来,第一项由司法部商两高纳入统一管理的鉴定类别。通过梳理我国环境损害司法鉴定之发展脉络,发现其在概念变迁、管理规范、功能转变三方面的演进呈现出逻辑特点。不过,环境损害司法鉴定目前面临“类鉴定意见”处境尴尬、“靶向式”管理存在张力、转化型功能保障缺位的困难。为此,须在法律与实践角度“双向”纾解困难、协调多方管理主体之关系、维系公益维护与修复赔偿的两重功能,以优化我国环境损害司法鉴定的发展路径。
Since the reform of the judicial expertise management system in 2005,the judicial expertise of environmental damage is the first one that has been brought into the unified management by the Ministry of justice and the Supreme People's court.By combing the development context of judicial expertise of environmental damage in China,it is found that its evolution in three aspects of conceptual change,management norms and functional change showed a logical characteristic.However,the judicial expertise of environmental damage is currently faced with the dilemma of"quasi expert opinion",the tension of"targeted"management,and the difficulty of the absence of transformed functional guarantee.Therefore,it is necessary to solve the difficulties in a"two-way"way from the perspective of law and practice,coordinate the relationship between multiple management subjects,and maintain the dual functions of public welfare maintenance and repair compensation,so as to optimize the development path of judicial expertise of environmental damage in China.
作者
罗宇昂
Luo Yuang(College of Criminal Investigation,Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Chongqing 401120,China)
出处
《河北环境工程学院学报》
CAS
2023年第2期44-50,66,共8页
Journal of Hebei University of Environmental Engineering
基金
2022年度西南政法大学校级学生科研创新项目(2022XZXS-133)
西南政法大学成渝地区双城经济圈公共法律服务人才培养协同创新团队专项课题(TDZX-2021013)
重庆市高校创新研究群体项目(CQQT21033)。
关键词
环境损害司法鉴定
鉴定意见
鉴定管理
鉴定功能
judicial expertise of environmental damage
appraisal opinions
administration of judicial expertise
functions of judicial expertise
