期刊文献+

中国式法治的情理法意蕴:礼法渊源、内涵结构及现代功用 被引量:1

The Emotion,Reason and Law Implication of Chinese Rule of Law:The Origin of Etiquette and Law,Connotational Structure and Modern Function
原文传递
导出
摘要 中国式法治是中国法治主体性的体现,其根源于中国特色社会主义法治实践,是对中国特色法治体系中传统优秀法律文化的时代表达。中国法律文化正在实现从法律东方主义到东方法律主义的蜕变,彰显出时代法律文化的自信与法学理论的自觉。中国式法治通过情理法意蕴诠释其个性特质,形塑其鲜明的“中国”特色。这种情理法意蕴根基于中国乡土社会,渊源于中国传统礼法文化,通过天理、国法与人情的协同治理模式以及“顶天立地”的结构布局和功能成就了中国式法治的价值。天理生法的“法天”关系、出礼入刑的“法礼”关系、法不外乎情的“法情”关系构成中国式法治情理法意蕴的内涵结构。在中国式法治现代化背景下,有必要通过情理法的关系重建及价值重塑实现传统中国式法治的创造性转化与创新性发展,通过非诉讼纠纷解决、诉源治理及协同治理等实践机制实现其现代功用。 Chinese rule of law is the embodiment of Chinese rule of law subjectivity,which comes from the practice of the socialist rule of law with Chinese characteristics and is an era expression of the traditional excellent legal culture in the legal system with Chinese characteristics.Chinese legal culture is realizing the transformation from legal orientalism to oriental legalism,showing the self-confidence of the legal culture of the times and the consciousness of legal theory.The Chinese-style rule of law interprets its personality traits through the connotation of emotion,reason and law,and shapes its distinctive""Chinese"characteristics.This connotation of emotion,reason and law is rooted in Chinese rural society and originated from traditional Chinese etiquette and law culture.Through the collaborative governance model of heavenly principles,national laws and human feelings,as well as the structural layout and functions of""upholding heaven and earth",the value of Chinese-style rule of law has been achieved.The relationship between the"law of heaven"and the"law of rites",the relationship between the"law of rites"and the"law of emotions"constitutes the connotation structure of the Chinese rule of law.In the context of the modernization of the Chinese rule of law,it is necessary to achieve the creative transformation and innovative development of the traditional Chinese rule of law through the relationship reconstruction and value reshaping of the law of reason and emotion,and to achieve its modern function through alternative dispute resolution,governance of the source of litigation and collaborative governance and other practical mechanisms.
作者 向达 XIANG Da(Law and Public Management School,Jishou University,Jishou,Hunan,416000)
出处 《深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2023年第2期90-100,共11页 Journal of Shenzhen University:Humanities & Social Sciences
基金 湖南省社会科学成果评审委员会项目“民族精神视域下德法融合的法律主体建构研究”(XSP2022YBC286) 湖南省教育厅重点项目“民间法促进武陵山片区五治结合的机理、路径及机制研究”(21A0342) 湖南省教改项目“地方高校法学专业学生‘德法兼修’研究与实践”(HNSJG529)。
关键词 中国式法治 情理法 隆礼重法 协同治理 非诉讼纠纷解决机制 the Chinese-style rule of law emotion,reason and law prospering etiquettes and respecting laws collaborative governance non-litigation dispute resolution mechanism
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献32

  • 1(美)詹姆斯·S.科尔曼(JamesS.Coleman)著,邓方.社会理论的基础[M]社会科学文献出版社,1999.
  • 2范忠信等编校,杨鹤皋.中国古代法律思想论集[M]中国政法大学出版社,2003.
  • 3乡土中国[M].
  • 4J.S. Metcalfe. Knowledge of growth and the growth of knowledge[J] 2002,Journal of Evolutionary Economics(1-2):3~15
  • 5Brian J. Loasby. Time, knowledge and evolutionary dynamics: why connections matter[J] 2001,Journal of Evolutionary Economics(4):393~412
  • 6Jason Potts. Knowledge and markets[J] 2001,Journal of Evolutionary Economics(4):413~431
  • 7Brian J. Loasby. Market institutions and economic evolution[J] 2000,Journal of Evolutionary Economics(3):297~309
  • 8Alan Kirman. The economy as an evolving network[J] 1997,Journal of Evolutionary Economics(4):339~353
  • 9Giovanni Dosi,Richard R. Nelson. An introduction to evolutionary theories in economics[J] 1994,Journal of Evolutionary Economics(3):153~172
  • 10(美)R.H.科斯(Coase,R.H.)等.财产权利与制度变迁[M]上海人民出版社,1994.

共引文献29

同被引文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部