摘要
对交通运输肇事后逃逸规定的理解,应将其认定为行为人逃避防止风险扩大化义务,具体包括两个方面:一是逃避防止被害人自身风险扩大化的义务;二是逃避防止公共交通安全风险扩大化的义务。判断行为人是否实施逃逸行为,在客观方面,应以结果为导向进行风险扩大化判断;在主观方面,明确逃逸是在“逃避法律责任”主观心理支配下实施的行为,将“逃避法律追究”理解成“为了逃避法律赋予的义务”,并不违背罪刑法定原则,但不宜将“逃避法律责任”与“逃跑”相混淆。司法实践中会出现义务冲突与罪数判断的困境,解决义务冲突的困境,需通过履行义务手段合理性和履行义务紧迫性进行系统分析;而在罪数判断的过程中,应提倡“结果加重犯”的观点。
The understanding of the provisions on escape after traffic accidents should be identified as the actor’s obligation to avoid risk expansion,which includes two aspects:first,to avoid the obligation to prevent the victim’s own risk expansion;the second is to avoid the obligation to prevent the expansion of public transport safety risks.To Judge whether the actor has carried out the escape behavior,in the objective aspect,risk expansion judgment should be guided by the results;in the subjective aspect,it should be established that escape is an act carried out under the control of the subjective psychology of“escaping legal responsibility”.It is not against the principle of legality to understand“escaping legal responsibility”as“to avoid the obligations conferred by the law”,but it is not appropriate to confuse“escaping legal responsibility”with“escaping”.In judicial practice,there will be the dilemma of obligation conflict and the judgment of the quantity of crimes.To solve the dilemma of obligation conflict,we need to systematically analyze the rationality of the means of performing obligations and the urgency of performing obligations.In the process of judging the quantity of crimes,we should advocate the viewpoint of“aggregated consequential offense”.
作者
施雄文
钟坚
Shi Xiongwen;Zhong Jian(School of Law,Wuhan University,Wuhan,Hubei 430072;College of Economics,Shenzhen University,Shenzhen,Guangdong 518060)
出处
《河南财经政法大学学报》
CSSCI
2023年第3期72-82,共11页
Journal of Henan University of Economics and Law
基金
2021年教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“刑法与治安管理处罚法的冲突研究——以构建轻罪体系为目标”(项目编号:21YJC820040)的阶段性成果。
关键词
逃逸
风险
扩大化
义务
罪数
escape
risk
expansion
obligations
quantity of crimes
