摘要
反垄断、反不正当竞争是完善社会主义经济体制、推动高质量发展的内在要求。《反垄断法》和《反不正当竞争法》是我国竞争法律体系的两大支柱,共同维护着市场竞争秩序。数字平台领域,我国反垄断和反不正当竞争司法成就斐然,但薄弱之处在于两者的衔接。数字平台不正当竞争纠纷的立案数和胜诉率均明显高于垄断纠纷,这与两法在裁决标准、举证责任方面的差异密切相关。本文通过分析大平台和小平台的竞争策略,研究大平台作为社会资源配置者对小平台市场行为的影响,在此基础上,提出《反垄断法》和《反不正当竞争法》应保持立法目标的一致、经济逻辑的相通、司法机构的同一、司法裁决的统一。
Anti-monopoly and anti-unfair competition are the inherent requirements for improving the socialist economic system and promoting high-quality development.The Anti-monopoly Law and the Anti-Unfair Competition Law are the two pillars of China's competition legal system,which jointly maintain the order of market competition.In the field of digital platform,China has made great achievements in anti-monopoly and anti-unfair competition judicial achievements,but the weakness lies in the connection.The number of cases and the winning rate of unfair competition disputes on the digital platform are significantly higher than those of monopoly disputes,which is closely related to the differences between the two laws in the standard of adjudication and the burden of proof.Through the analysis of large platform and small platform competition strategy,research platform as a social resource allocation to the influence of small platform market behavior,put forward the antitrust law and the antiunfair competition law should maintain consistent legislative goal,the same economic logic,the unity of the judicial decision.
作者
冯博
张家琛
FENG Bo;ZHANG Jiachen
出处
《法治研究》
CSSCI
2023年第3期83-94,共12页
Research on Rule of Law
基金
教育部人文社科重点研究基地重大项目“数字平台行业监管与市场监管的分工与协调研究”(项目编号:22JJD790005)
司法部国家法治与法学理论研究项目“反垄断后继诉讼的功能定位和实践应用”(项目编号:19SFB2049)阶段性成果。
关键词
数字平台
反垄断法
反不正当竞争法
竞争政策
digital platform
anti-monopoly law
anti-unfair competition law
competition policy
