摘要
[目的/意义]学术数据库是当前科学交流的基础设施之一,科研人员等科学交流主体通过对学术数据的使用交互实现科学价值的创造,明晰学术数据库在科学价值创造过程中的特点及作用。[方法/过程]本文尝试应用价值共创的理论,从学术数据库知识服务的交互特征和价值创造特点两个维度,对学术数据库的资源订阅模式、智能分析增值模式以及开放科学服务模式进行对比分析。[结果/结论]结果显示,这些模式之间并不存在明显的划分界限,且都分别实现了共创过程中的商业价值、学术经验价值和科学价值,但在价值共创机制、知识服务体验以及科学交流危机及学术伦理等方面仍有很大探索空间。
[Purpose/Significance]Academic database is one of the infrastructures in scientific communication at present,and scientific communication entities such as researchers realize the creation of scientific value through interaction in the use of academic data.In order to clarify the characteristics and role of academic databases in the process of scientific value creation,[Method/Process]this paper attempted to apply the theory of value co-creation to compare and analyze the resource subscription model,the intelligent analysis value-added model and the open science service model of academic database from two dimensions:the interactive characteristics and value creation characteristics of knowledge service.[Result/Conclusion]The results show that there is no clear demarcation between these models,and they all realize the commercial value,academic experience value and scientific value in the co-creation process respectively,but there is still much room for exploration in the value co-creation mechanism,knowledge service experience,and scientific communication crisis and academic ethics.
作者
徐雷
郑子贺
叶均玲
Xu Lei;Zheng Zihe;Ye Junling(Key laboratory of Semantic Publishing and Knowledge Service,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430072,China;Laboratory of Cultural Heritage Intelligent Computing,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430072,China)
出处
《现代情报》
CSSCI
2023年第6期3-13,共11页
Journal of Modern Information
基金
教育部规划基金项目“科学出版物语义组织模式及其实现路径研究”(项目编号:20A10486066)。
关键词
学术数据库
知识服务
价值共创
模式
比较研究
academic database
knowledge service
value co-creation
model
comparative study
