期刊文献+

单中心新生儿出生体重曲线的建立方法及临床意义 被引量:1

Establishment method and significance of birthweight curve and reference in single center
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的依据本中心队列数据采用不同方法建立新生儿出生体重曲线, 并与目前国内常用的协作网G曲线[采用基于偏度系数-中位数-变异系数法的广义可加模型(GAMLSS)拟合方法制定]进行比较, 探讨适宜本中心的新生儿出生体重标准。方法基于2017年1月1日至2022年2月28日于南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院行妊娠早期胎儿结构超声筛查的前瞻性出生缺陷研究队列中的活产儿7 044例, 对其中无小于胎龄儿(SGA)及大于胎龄儿(LGA)高危因素的低风险孕妇3 894例, 分别采用GAMLSS法、基于低风险孕妇孕40周分娩新生儿平均出生体重和标准差采用半定制法建立本中心GAMLSS曲线(简称本中心G曲线)、本中心半定制曲线(简称本中心S曲线)。依据本中心S曲线、本中心G曲线对7 044例活产儿是否为SGA进行诊断, 分为非SGA组(6 176例)、S较G额外诊断组(94例)、S及G均诊断组(774例), 比较3组孕妇不良围产结局的发生率;依据本中心S曲线、协作网G曲线对7 044例活产儿是否为SGA进行诊断, 分为非SGA组(6 176例)、S较协作网G额外诊断组(464例)、S及协作网G均诊断组(404例), 比较3组孕妇不良围产结局的发生率。结果 (1)7 044例活产儿中, 依据协作网G曲线、本中心G曲线及本中心S曲线诊断SGA分别为404例(5.74%, 404/7 044)、774例(10.99%, 774/7 044)、868例(12.32%, 868/7 044)。本中心S曲线新生儿出生体重的第10百分位数值在所有胎龄均高于本中心G曲线和协作网G曲线。(2)S较G额外诊断组、S及G均诊断组入住新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)时间>24 h的发生率[分别为10.64%(10/94)、5.68%(44/774)]均显著高于非SGA组[1.34%(83/6 176);P均<0.001];S较G额外诊断组、S及G均诊断组孕妇子痫前期(PE)的发生率分别为12.77%(12/94)、9.43%(73/774), 孕34周前早产发生率分别为9.57%(9/94)、2.71%(21/774), 孕37周前早产的发生率分别为24.47%(23/94)、7.24%(56/774), 均显著高于非SGA组[分别为4.37%(270/6 176)、0.83%(51/6 176)、4.23%(261/6 176);P均<0.001]。(3)S较协作网G额外诊断组、S及协作网G均诊断组新生儿入住NICU时间>24 h的发生率[分别为5.60%(26/464)、6.93%(28/404)]均显著高于非SGA组(P均<0.001);S较协作网G额外诊断组、S及协作网G均诊断组孕妇因不确定的胎儿状态(NRFS)行紧急剖宫产术或产钳助产的发生率[分别为4.96%(23/464)、12.38%(50/404)]均高于非SGA组[2.57%(159/6 176);P均<0.001];S较协作网G额外诊断组、S及协作网G均诊断组孕妇PE的发生率分别为8.84%(41/464)和10.89%(44/404), 孕34周前早产发生率分别为4.31%(20/464)和2.48%(10/404), 孕37周前早产的发生率分别为10.56%(49/464)和7.43%(30/404), 均显著高于非SGA组(P均<0.001)。结论相较于协作网G曲线和本中心G曲线, 依据本中心低风险活产儿出生体重, 采用半定制法建立的本中心S曲线更有利于本中心SGA的筛查, 有助于高危儿的识别和管理。 Objective To establish neonatal birthweight percentile curves based on single-center cohort database using different methods,compare them with the current national birthweight curves and discuss the appropriateness and significance of single-center birthweight standard.Methods Based on a prospective first-trimester screening cohort at Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital from January 2017 to February 2022,the generalized additive models for location,scale and shape(GAMLSS)and semi-customized method were applied to generate local birthweight percentile curves(hereinafter referred to as the local GAMLSS curves,semi-customized curves)for 3894 cases who were at low risk of small for gestation age(SGA)and large for gestation age(LGA).Infants were categorized as SGA(birth weight<10th centile)by both semi-customized and local GAMLSS curves,semi-customized curves only,or not SGA(met neither criteria).The incidence of adverse perinatal outcome between different groups was compared.The same method was used to compare the semi-customized curves with the Chinese national birthweight curves(established by GAMLSS method as well,hereinafter referred to as the national GAMLSS curves).Results(1)Among the 7044 live births,404(5.74%,404/7044),774(10.99%,774/7044)and 868(12.32%,868/7044)cases were diagnosed as SGA according to the national GAMLSS curves,the local GAMLSS curves and the semi-customized curves respectively.The birth weight of the 10th percentile of the semi-customized curves was higher than that of the local GAMLSS curves and the national GAMLSS curves at all gestational age.(2)When comparing semi-customized curves and the local GAMLSS curves,the incidence of admission to neonatal intensive care unit(NICU)for more than 24 hours of infants identified as SGA by semi-customized curves only(94 cases)and both semi-customized and local GAMLSS curves(774 cases)was 10.64%(10/94)and 5.68%(44/774)respectively,both significantly higher than that in non SGA group[6176 cases,1.34%(83/6176);P<0.001].The incidence of preeclampsia,pregnancy<34 weeks,and pregnancy<37 weeks of infants identified as SGA by the semi-customized curves only and both semi-customized and local GAMLSS curves was 12.77%(12/94)and 9.43%(73/774),9.57%(9/94)and 2.71%(21/774),24.47%(23/94)and 7.24%(56/774)respectively,which were significantly higher than those of the non SGA group[4.37%(270/6176),0.83%(51/6176),4.23%(261/6176);all P<0.001].(3)When comparing semi-customized curves and the national GAMLSS curves,the incidence of admission to NICU for more than 24 hours of infants identified as SGA by semi-customized curves only(464 cases)and both semi-customized and national GAMLSS curves(404 cases)was 5.60%(26/464)and 6.93%(28/404)respectively,both significantly higher than that in non SGA group[6176 cases,1.34%(83/6176);all P<0.001].The incidence of emergency cesarean section or forceps delivery for non-reassuring fetal status(NRFS)in infants identified as SGA by semi-customized curves only and both semi-customized and national GAMLSS curves was 4.96%(23/464)and 12.38%(50/404),both significantly higher than that in the non SGA group[2.57%(159/6176);all P<0.001].The incidence of preeclampsia,pregnancy<34 weeks,and pregnancy<37 weeks in the semi-customized curves only group and both semi-customized and national GAMLSS curves group was 8.84%(41/464)and 10.89%(44/404),4.31%(20/464)and 2.48%(10/404),10.56%(49/464)and 7.43%(30/404)respectively,all significantly higher than those in the non SGA group[4.37%(270/6176),0.83%(51/6176),4.23%(261/6176);all P<0.001].Conclusion Compared with the national GAMLSS birthweight curves and the local GAMLSS curves,the birth weight curves established by semi-customized method based on our single center database is in line with our center′SGA screening,which is helpful to identify and strengthen the management of high-risk infants.
作者 王娅 王媛 唐慧荣 张燕 戴晨燕 李洁 戴毅敏 郑明明 Wang Ya;Wang Yuan;Tang Huirong;Zhang Yan;Dai Chenyan;Li Jie;Dai Yimin;Zheng Mingming(Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology,Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital,Nanjing University Medical School,Nanjing 210008,China)
出处 《中华妇产科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2023年第5期334-342,共9页 Chinese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
基金 国家重点研发计划(2021YFC2701603)。
关键词 出生体重 婴儿 小于胎龄 生长图表 队列研究 Birth weight Infant,small for gestational age Growth charts Cohort studies
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献41

  • 1中国15城市新生儿体格发育科研协作组.我国15城市不同胎龄新生儿体格发育调查研究[J].中华儿科杂志,1988,26(4):206-208.
  • 2Fortes Filho JB, Valiatti FB, Eckert GU, et al. Is being small for gestational age a risk factor for retinopathy of prematurity? A study with 345 very low birth weight preterm infants[ J]. J Pediatr( Rio J), 2009,85 (1):48-54.
  • 3Hong R, Ruiz-Beltran M. Low birth weight as a risk factor for infant mortality in Egypt [ J ]. East Mediterr Health J, 2008,14 (5) :992-1002.
  • 4Wang KC, Botting KJ, Padhee M, et al. Early origins of heart disease: low birth weight and the role of the insulin-like growth factor system in cardiac hypertrophy [ J ]. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol, 2012,39 ( 11 ) :958-964.
  • 5Fenton TR. A new growth chart for preterm babies: Babson and Benda's chart updated with recent data and a new format [ J ]. BMC Pediatr, 2003,3:13.
  • 6WHO. WHO Child Growth Standards: Length/height-for-age, weight-for-age, weight-for-length, weight-for-height and body mass index-for-age [ DB ]. Geneva : WHO, 2006 : 1-336.
  • 7Rigby RA, Stasinopoulos DM. Smooth centile curves for skew and kurtotic data modelled using the Box-Cox power exponential distribution. Stat Med, 2004,23 (19) :3053-3076.
  • 8van Buuren S, Fredriks M. Worm plot: a simple diagnostic device for modelling growth reference curves. Stat Med, 2001,20 (8) : 1259-1277.
  • 9Pan H, Cole TJ. A comparison of goodness of fit tests for age- related reference ranges. Stat Med ,2004,23 ( 11 ) : 1749-1765.
  • 10Liu Z, Zhang J, Zhao B, et al. Population-based reference for birth weight for gestational age in northern China[ J]. Early Hum Dev, 2014, 90(4) :177-187.

共引文献724

同被引文献19

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部