期刊文献+

“互联网+”延续护理平台对食管癌患者生命质量的影响 被引量:2

The impact of“Internet+”extended care platform on the quality of life of patients with esophageal cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:构建食管癌“互联网+”延续护理平台,并探讨食管癌“互联网+”延续护理平台对食管癌患者术后不同时间段内生命质量的影响。方法:回顾性分析117例食管癌患者的临床资料,按照是否干预将患者分为干预组(n=59)与对照组(n=58)。干预组严格按照本研究构建的延续护理平台进行干预;对照组采用电话随访、门诊随访和家庭访视进行调查。确定食管癌患者术后“互联网+”延续护理平台的构建体系和平台内容。在“互联网+”延续护理干预前后的不同时间点,收集两组患者术后随访数据。比较两组患者干预前后的症状和生命质量的差异。结果:干预前,两组患者总体健康状况得分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。干预后3、6个月,干预组总体健康状况得分均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。干预前,两组躯体、角色、情绪、认知及社会维度得分比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。干预后3、6个月,干预组躯体、角色、情绪及认知各维度得分均高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。干预后,干预组患者总体健康状况、躯体功能、角色功能、情绪功能、社会功能等生命质量指标均优于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:相较于常规的延续护理,基于微信平台的延续护理可明显改善患者总体健康状况。 Objective:To construct an“Internet+”extended care platform for esophageal cancer and to explore the impact of the“Internet+”extended care platform on the quality of life of esophageal cancer patients in different time periods after surgery.Methods:The clinical data of 117 patients with esophageal cancer were retrospective analysis,and they were divided into intervention group(n=59)and control group(n=58)based on whether or not to intervene.The intervention group strictly followed the continuous care platform constructed in this study for intervention,and the control group was surveyed using telephone follow-up,outpatient follow-up,and home visits.The construction system and content of the“Internet+”extended care platform for postoperative patients with esophageal cancer were determined.The postoperative follow-up data of esophageal cancer patients in the intervention and control groups were collected at different time points before and after the“Internet+”extended care intervention.The differences in symptoms and quality of life between the intervention group and the control group before and after the intervention were analyzed.Results:Before the intervention,there was no statistically significant difference between the overall health status scores of the two groups(P>0.05).At 3 and 6 months after the intervention,the overall health status scores of the intervention group were higher than those of the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Before the intervention,there was no statistically significant difference between the scores of somatic,role,emotional,cognitive and social dimensions in the two groups(P>0.05).At 3 and 6 months after the intervention,the scores of the somatic,role,emotional and cognitive dimensions were higher in the intervention group than in the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).After the intervention,the patients in the intervention group had better overall health status,somatic function,role function,emotional function,social function and other quality of life indicators than the control group(P<0.05).Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator(free version).Conclusion:Compared with conventional extended care,the extended care based on the WeChat platform can significantly improve the overall health status of patients.
作者 张小燕 李红云 黎辰晨 申春梅 文红英 ZHANG Xiao-yan;LI Hong-yun;LI Chen-chen;SHEN Chun-mei;WEN Hong-ying(Department of Thoracic Surgery,Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical,Nanchong 637000,Sichuan,China;Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery ICU,Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical,Nanchong 637000,Sichuan,China;Interventional Room,Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical,Nanchong 637000,Sichuan,China)
出处 《川北医学院学报》 CAS 2023年第5期711-714,共4页 Journal of North Sichuan Medical College
基金 南充市社会科学研究“十四五”规划项目(NC22B043) 南充市市校科技战略合作项目(22SXQT0203)。
关键词 互联网+ 延续护理 食管癌 “Internet+” Extended care Esophageal cancer
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献170

  • 1万崇华,陈明清,张灿珍,汤学良,孟琼,张晓磬.癌症患者生命质量测定量表EORTC QLQ-C30中文版评介[J].实用肿瘤杂志,2005,20(4):353-355. 被引量:1230
  • 2李翠淑.结肠造口患者自我护理能力与健康行为的相关性研究[J].护理管理杂志,2006,6(9):3-5. 被引量:44
  • 3D. Osoba,N.K. Aaronson,M. Muller,K. Sneeuw,M.-A. Hsu,W.K.A. Yung,M. Brada,E. Newlands. Effect of neurological dysfunction on health-related quality of life in patients with high-grade glioma[J] 1997,Journal of Neuro - Oncology(3):263~278
  • 4D. Osoba,B. Zee,J. Pater,D. Warr,L. Kaizer,J. Latreille. Psychometric properties and responsiveness of the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) in patients with breast, ovarian and lung cancer[J] 1994,Quality of Life Research(5):353~364
  • 5C. A. C. Schag,P. A. Ganz,D. S. Wing,M. -S. Sim,J. J. Lee. Quality of life in adult survivors of lung, colon and prostate cancer[J] 1994,Quality of Life Research(2):127~141
  • 6H. E. Niezgoda,J. L. Pater. A validation study of the domains of the core EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire[J] 1993,Quality of Life Research(5):319~325
  • 7V. Sigurdardóttir,C. Bolund,Y. Brandberg,M. Sullivan. The impact of generalized malignant melanoma on quality of life evaluated by the EORTC questionnaire technique[J] 1993,Quality of Life Research(3):193~203
  • 8Naylor MD,A iken LH,Kurtzman ET,et al.The importance of transitional care in achieving health reform[J].Health Aff,2011,30:746-754.
  • 9Donabedian A.The quality of care,how can it be assessed?[J].JAMA,1988,260(12):1743-1748.
  • 10Jayadevappa R,Chhatre S,Johnson JC,et al.Variation in quality of care among older men with localized prostate cancer[J].CA,2011,117(11):2520-2529.

共引文献795

同被引文献35

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部