摘要
长期以来存在一种普遍的印象,即社会科学在早期是相对无空间的,但这并不意味着其中缺乏关于空间的论述。实际上,在涂尔干和哈布瓦赫的著作中,存在一条围绕着社会空间的越发成熟但又未被充分完成的思想脉络。涂尔干关于空间的论述一方面涉及作为观念对象的物质空间,另一方面又涉及需要在知识社会学框架中加以理解的作为知性范畴的一般空间。总的来讲,尽管他偶尔提到“社会空间”的说法,但还未形成一种系统的社会空间理论。而哈布瓦赫则基于对涂尔干社会形态学的批判性吸收,到晚期逐步发展出一种更加复杂、抽象,但又因其早逝而未充分完成的社会空间理论。这条关于社会空间思想的进路无论在他们之后的社会学还是与之相关的人文地理学内部,都少有继承者和追随者。
There has long been a common impression that space as a topic was less discussed in the social sciences in its early days,but it doesn't mean that there was short of discussing space in their domain.In fact,in the works of émile Durkheim and Maurice Halbwachs,there is an increasingly mature but not fully completed thought genealogy around the concept of social space.Durkheim's discussion of space on the one hand involves material space as an object of ideas,and on the other hand it is embodied as general space as an intellectual category understood in the framework of sociology of knowledge.In short,although he occasionally mentions the term of “social space”,he has not developed a systematic theory of social space.As for Halbwachs,based on his critical absorption of Durkheim's social morphology,he gradually developed a more complex and abstract social space theory in the late period,which was not fully completed due to his premature death.Finally,this approach to social space thought has few successors and followers either in sociology or in the related human geography.
作者
黄剑波
马郁靖
孙攀搁
HUANG Jianbo;MA Yujing;SUN Pan'ge
出处
《西北民族研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2023年第2期93-103,共11页
Journal of Northwestern Ethnic Studies
关键词
涂尔干
哈布瓦赫
社会空间
知识社会学
Emile Durkheim
Maurice Halbwachs
Social Space
Sociology of Knowledge
