摘要
[目的]从产业兴旺、生态宜居、乡风文明、治理有效、生活富裕等5个维度构建乡村振兴绩效评估指标体系,为乡村振兴绩效评估提供科学参考。[方法]引入全排列多边形图示指标模型,对福建省2011—2020年的乡村振兴战略推进绩效水平进行综合评估。[结果]福建省“十二五”期间的产业兴旺指数总体优于“十三五”期间(p<0.05),与之相反,“十二五”期间的乡风文明指数总体小于“十三五”期间(p>0.05)。“十三五”期间的生态宜居、治理有效、生活富裕等指数均处于较高水平,其绩效水平均优于“十二五”期间(p<0.01)。2011—2020年福建省乡村振兴绩效综合评估指数分别为0.001~1.458,总体上呈“上升—下降—上升”的N形变化趋势。2011—2015年的乡村振兴绩效综合评估指数总体小于2016—2020年(p<0.05)。[结论]研究期内,福建省乡村振兴推进绩效水平优劣顺序为:2020,2019,2018,2015,2016,2017,2014,2013,2012,2011年。2018—2020年福建省乡村振兴绩效综合评估指数相对较高。在乡村振兴战略推动过程中,应结合各个地市实际情况,细化绩效考核评价指标体系,构建乡村振兴绩效考核制度。
[Objective]The rural revitalization performance evaluation index system was constructed based on five dimensions:thriving businesses,pleasant living environments,social etiquette and civility,effective governance,and prosperity,in order to provide references for comprehensive evaluation of rural revitalization performance.[Methods]Rural revitalization performance in Fujian Province was evaluated by applying the entire-array-polygon synthesis illustration model from 2011—2020.[Results]The thriving businesses index for the 12th Five-Year Plan period was better than that of the 13th Five-Year Plan period(p<0.05).In contrast,the social etiquette and civility index for the 12th Five-Year Plan period was lower than that of the 13th Five-Year Plan period(p>0.05).Performance indexes for pleasant living environments,effective governance,and prosperity for the 13th Five-Year Plan period were at a high level,and the performance level was better than that of the 12th Five-Year Plan period(p<0.01).From 2011 to 2020,the comprehensive evaluation index of rural revitalization performance in Fujian Province ranged from 0.001 to 1.458,showing an N-shaped trend of up-down-up.The performance level from 2011 to 2015 was lower than the level observed from 2016 to 2020(p<0.05).[Conclusion]Rural revitalization performance in Fujian Province during the study period decreased following the year order of 2020>2019>2018>2015>2016>2017<2014>2013>2012>2011.Rural revitalization performance in Fujian Province was relatively higher from 2018 to 2020.In the process of promoting rural revitalization strategy,people should refine the performance evaluation index system and construct a rural revitalization performance evaluation system based on the actual situation of each city.
作者
饶清华
游武
赵天予
林秀珠
陈芳
邱雪芬
陈文花
林云杉
Rao Qinghua;You Wu;Zhao Tianyu;Lin Xiuzhu;Chen Fang;Qiu Xuefen;Chen Wenhua;Lin Yunshan(Fujian Provincial Key Lab of Coastal Basin Environment(Fujian Polytechnic Normal University),Fuqing,Fujian 350300,China;Fujian Agricultural Ecological Environment and Energy Technology Extension Station,Fuzhou,Fujian 350003,China;School of Social Development and Public Policy,Fudan University,Shanghai 200433,China;Fujian Environmental Monitoring Center,Fuzhou,Fujian 350003,China)
出处
《水土保持通报》
CSCD
北大核心
2023年第2期381-388,共8页
Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation
基金
福建省习近平新时代中国特色社会主义思想研究中心重大项目“福建乡村振兴绩效水平评估研究”(FJ2021XZZ011)。
关键词
乡村振兴
产业兴旺
生态宜居
乡风文明
治理有效
生活富裕
福建省
rural revitalization
thriving businesses
pleasant living environments
social etiquette and civility
effective governance
prosperity
Fujian Province
