摘要
受各国人工智能发展规划影响,教育人工智能伦理原则研究起步晚于其他领域,塑造了其参照已有原则“共识”的构建取向。目前,对“共识”的反思及对教育领域个性要素的探寻逐渐受到研究者关注,超越“共识”成为教育人工智能伦理原则构建的发展趋势。“共识”暗含的“非共识”要素是制约教育人工智能伦理原则实践效果的根本原因,包括国别间的历史与文化差异,领域间的结构与指向差异,应用间的内容与对象差异,自身间的概念与关系差异。超越“共识”实际上便是在已有研究的基础上弥合“非共识”要素。更直接的说,就是承认教育人工智能伦理原则的有限性,即价值匹配的有限性、领域作用的有限性、指导时效的有限性,从而在构建教育人工智能伦理原则时坚持本土立场,明确目的导向,保持持续开放。
Influenced by the development plans of various countries on artificial intelligence,research on ethical principles of AI education started later than other areas and shaped its construction orientation with reference to existing“consensus”principles.Currently,researchers are gradually paying attention to reflecting on the“consensus”and exploring the individual elements of the education field,surpassing the“consensus”becoming the development trend for constructing ethical principles in AI education.The fundamental reason that limits the practical effect of ethical principles in AI education is the“non-consensus”element implied by the“consensus”,including historical and cultural differences between countries,structural and directional differences between fields,content and object differences between applications,and conceptual and relational differences within themselves.To surpass the“consensus”means bridging the“non-consensus”elements based on existing research.More directly,it is acknowledging the limitations of ethical principles in AI education,including the limitations in value matching,domain applicability,and guidance timeliness,thus adhering to a local stance,clarifying purpose orientation,and maintaining continuous openness when constructing ethical principles in AI education.
作者
白钧溢
于伟
Bai Junyi;Yu Wei(Faculty of Education,Northeast Normal University,Changchun 130024,Jilin)
出处
《中国电化教育》
CSSCI
北大核心
2023年第6期9-17,24,共10页
China Educational Technology
基金
2022吉林省社会科学基金项目“中国‘Z世代’亚文化圈层语言的区隔性研究”(项目编号:2022C78)
2022东北师范大学教师教育“揭榜领题”一般项目“教师‘社会与情感能力’的国际框架与本土转化研究”(项目编号:JSJY20220302)研究成果。
关键词
教育人工智能
伦理原则
超越共识
发展方向
AI education
ethical principles
beyond consensus
direction of development
