摘要
目的:修订形成慢性心力衰竭病人运动恐惧量表,并检验其信效度。方法:遵循Brislin原则对冠心病病人运动恐惧量表(Fact-CAD)进行翻译和修订,形成中文版慢性心力衰竭病人运动恐惧量表。选择江苏省3所三级甲等医院就诊的278例慢性心力衰竭病人作为研究对象进行调查,检验量表信效度。结果:量表Cronbach’sα系数为0.883,折半信度为0.843,重测信度为0.902。量表水平的内容效度指数为0.902,条目水平的内容效度指数为0.857~1.000,效标效度的Pearson相关系数为0.601。验证性因子分析提示中文版量表单维性结构良好。最终保留15个条目形成中文版慢性心力衰竭病人运动恐惧量表。结论:中文版慢性心力衰竭病人运动恐惧量表具有良好的信效度,可评估慢性心力衰竭病人的运动恐惧水平。
Objective:To revise and develop the Chinese version of Fear of Activity in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure(Fact-CHF),and to test its reliability and validity.Methods:According to Brislin principle,the Fear of Activity in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease was translated and revised to form the Chinese version of Fact-CHF.The reliability and validity of Chinese version of Fact-CHF were tested by means of questionaire among 278 patients with chronic heart failure from 3 tertiary grade A hospitals in Jiangsu province.Results:The Cronbach'sαcoefficient of Chinese version of Fact-CHF was 0.883.The overall split-half reliability was 0.843.The overall test-retest reliability was 0.902.The scale-content validity index(S-CVI)was 0.902,and the item-content validity index(I-CVI)ranged from 0.857 to 1.000.The correlation validity coefficient of the calibration scale was 0.601.Confirmatory factor analysis suggested that the dimension structure of the Chinese version of Fact-CHF was good.Finally,15 items were retained to form the Chinese version of Fact-CHF.Conclusion:The Chinese version of Fact-CHF had good reliability and validity.It can be used to evaluate the level of exercise fear in patients with chronic heart failure.
作者
高敏
孙国珍
王倩怡
王洁
黄杨曦
于甜栖
刘沈馨雨
温高芹
GAO Min;SUN Guozhen;WANG Qianyi;WANG Jie;HUANG Yangxi;YU Tianxi;LIU Shenxinyu;WEN Gaoqin(The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University,Jiangsu 210029 China)
出处
《护理研究》
北大核心
2023年第11期1907-1913,共7页
Chinese Nursing Research
基金
国家自然科学基金面上项目,编号:72074124
江苏省人民医院“临床能力提升工程”护理项目,编号:JSPH-NC-2021-4。
关键词
慢性心力衰竭
运动恐惧
经典测量理论
项目反应理论
信度
效度
chronic heart failure
fear of activity
classical test theory,CTT
item response theory,IRT
reliability
validity
