期刊文献+

智能网联汽车通信标准必要专利许可及其反垄断规制 被引量:2

Standard-Essential Patent License and Antitrust Regulation for Intelligent Connected Vehicle Communications
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在全球范围内,标准必要专利已成为汽车市场竞争的博弈焦点。由于FRAND原则、许可模式的模糊性,当前面临着关于许可层级、许可模式等标准必要专利许可纠纷难题。由于标准的必须实施性和专利的天然“垄断性”,导致标准必要专利权利人的话语权较强,极易产生“专利劫持”、一揽子许可等专利权滥用问题。相较于私法调整,从反垄断角度出发规制标准必要专利滥用行为更具有适用性,而标准必要专利垄断纠纷的认定思路应遵循我国《反垄断法》的基本分析框架,以确定相关市场,判断其是否具备市场支配地位,分析是否滥用知识产权,对市场竞争产生排除、限制影响等。 Globally,standard-essential patents have become the focus of competition in the automobile market.Due to the ambiguity of the FRAND principle and the licensing mode,we are currently facing many disputes over licensing tiers and licensing modes for standar d-essential patents.Due to the mandatory implementation of standards and the natural“monopoly”of patents,the right holders of patents have more right,which can easily lead to patent hold-up,blanket licensing and other patent abuse problems.Compared with the Judicial adjustments,it is more applicable to regulate the abuse of standard-essential patents from the angle of anti-monopoly,and the determination of disputes over monopoly of them should follow the basic analytical framework of China’s Antitrust Law,in order to determine the relevant market,judge whether it has a dominant position in the market,analyze whether it is an abuse of intellectual property rights,and exclude and restrict the impact of the competition in the market.
作者 王军雷 龙悦 王亮亮 Wang Junlei;Long Yue Wang;Liangliang(China Automotive Technology and Research Center Co.Ltd.,Tianjin 300300)
出处 《西部学刊》 2023年第13期150-154,共5页 Journal of Western
关键词 标准必要专利 智能网联汽车 反垄断规制 standard-essential patents intelligent connected vehicle Antitrust Regulation
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献76

  • 1James Surowiecki, Turn of the Century, WIRED, Jan.2002, at 85.
  • 2Mark A. Lemley, Antitrust and Interuet Standardization Problem, 28 CONN. L. Rev. 1041, 1069(1996).
  • 3FTC/DOJ, To Promote Innovation: The Proper Balance of Competition and Patent Law and Policy, at ch..1, pp.8-9(Oct.2003), available at http://www.ftc.gov/os/2OO3/10/innovationrpt.pdf.
  • 4In the Matter of Dell Computer Corp., 121 F.T.C. 616(1996), AT 642 n.2.
  • 5Carl Shapiro, Navigating the Patent Thicket: Cross Licenses, Patent Pools and Standard Setting, Adam Jaffe, Joshua Lerner, Scott Stem, eds, 1 INNOVATION POLICY AND THE ECONOMY 119, 125(2001).
  • 6Joseph Farrell, John Hayes, Carl Shapiro, & Theresa Sullivan, Standard Setting, Patents, and Hold-up, 13 Augst 2007. pl0. http://facuhy.haas.berkeley.edu/shairo/standards2007.pdf.
  • 7Pate, R. Hewitt, Competition, on and Intellectual Property in the US: Licensing Freedom and the Limits of Antitrust, EU Competition Workshop.
  • 8Richard T. Rapp and Lauren J. Stiroh, Standard Setting and Market Power, pp5-6. http://www.ftc.gov/opp/intellect/020418 rappstiroh.pdf.
  • 9“IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws, Section6: Patents”2006.(IEEE-SA Bylaws); "ETST Guide on Intellectual Property Rights," 2005.(ETSI Guide).
  • 10Richard T. Rapp and Lauren J. Stiroh, Standard Setting and Market Power, p6.

共引文献30

同被引文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部