摘要
自《民法典》颁布以来,生态环境修复得到了实体法上的支持,同时也引起了诸多争议。从逻辑上看,生态环境修复责任的适用应当以法律性质的明确为前提。结合《民法典》的立法进程和体系安排,可以明确生态环境修复责任是传统民法理论上恢复原状责任的环境法延伸,在《民法典》中写入生态环境修复责任这一公益性质条款体现出公私法协同应对生态环境问题的价值归旨。面对生态环境修复责任相关制度在立法上的缺失,应当结合生态环境修复成本限度的科学前提,明确履行时限,统一修复标准,完善监管体系,为生态环境修复责任构建起规范意义上的现实路径。
Since the promulgation of the Civil Code,ecological and environmental restoration has been supported by substantive laws.Meanwhile,it causes a lot of controversy.From the logic point of view,the application of ecological environmental restoration responsibility should be based on the explicit legal nature.Combining with the legislative process and system arrangement of the Civil Code,it is clear that the responsibility of ecological environment restoration is the extension of the responsibility of restoring in environmental law.It can be analysed that why the Civil Code has included ecological environmental restoration responsibility which is a public welfare clause is that the coordination of public-private law is necessary for ecological environment issues.In the face of the absence of the ecological environment restoration responsibility system in legislation,combining the cost limit of the ecological environment restoration responsibility,what should be done is clarifying the time limit for implementation,unifying repair standards and improving the regulatory system to construct realistic path in norm for the ecological environment restoration responsibility.
作者
胡世亮
吴志良
Hu Shiliang;Wu Zhiliang(Wuhan University,Wuhan 430000,China)
出处
《湖北警官学院学报》
2023年第3期13-20,共8页
Journal of Hubei University of Police
关键词
生态环境损害赔偿
生态修复责任
民法典
侵权责任
私法公法化
Ecological and Environmental Damage Compensation
Ecological Environment Restoration Responsibility
Civil Code
Tortious Liability
Private Laws Publicize
