期刊文献+

试析领导干部治理能力考评指标体系的构建 被引量:1

An Analysis of the Evaluation Index System of Leading Cadres'Governance Ability
原文传递
导出
摘要 党的二十大报告提出,到二〇三五年,基本实现国家治理体系和治理能力现代化。加强领导干部治理能力建设,是新的历史时期推进国家治理能力现代化的必然要求,也是以中国式现代化全面推进中华民族伟大复兴的应有之义。考核评价对领导干部治理能力提升发挥着导向指导、诊断反馈、鞭策促进的作用。建立领导干部治理能力考核评价指标体系,是提高领导干部治理能力、推进国家治理体系和治理能力现代化的一项重大任务。基于习近平总书记关于治理能力的重要论述、党内法规关于干部能力素质的规范以及对领导干部的访谈,提出领导干部治理能力是领导干部充分发挥多元治理主体的作用,运用制度法规与价值理念引导、控制和规范各种活动,提高治理绩效所应具备的能力集合。以领导干部治理能力的内涵为基础,初步设计领导干部治理能力的考评指标框架,通过专家咨询、因子分析等一系列过程,最终得到包含政治能力、制度能力、文化能力和组织能力在内的四维度14条行为指标的领导干部治理能力考评指标体系。其中,政治能力提供方向的秩序,明确目标;制度能力提供规则的秩序,规范行为;文化能力提供思想的秩序,凝聚共识;组织能力提供组织的秩序,整合资源。 The report of the 20th National Congress of the CPC proposed that the modernization of the national governance system and governance capacity should be basically realized by 2035.Strengthening the governance capacity of leading cadres is an inevitable requirement for promoting the modernization of national governance capacity in the new historical period.It is also an inherent meaning of comprehensively promoting the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation through Chinese path to modernization.Assessment and evaluation play a role of guidance,diagnosis and feedback,spur and promotion for the improvement of leading cadres'governance ability.It is an important task to establish the evaluation index system of leading cadres'governance ability and promote the modernization of the national governance system and governance ability.Based on the connotation of leading cadres'governance ability,this paper preliminarily designs the evaluation index framework of leading cadres'governance ability.Through a series of processes such as expert consultation and factor analysis,it finally obtains the evaluation index system of leading cadres'governance ability,which contains 14 behavioral indexes from four dimensions including political ability,institutional ability,cultural ability and organizational ability.Among them,political capacity provides direction to order,clear goals;institutional capacity provides regular order and regulate behavior;cultural competence provides order of thought and builds consensus;organizational ability provides organizational order and integrates resources.
作者 何丽君 梁祺源 He Lijun;Liang Qiyuan
出处 《上海行政学院学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2023年第4期16-28,共13页 The Journal of Shanghai Administration Institute
基金 2022年国家社科基金社科学术社团主题学术活动项目“新时代提升党的领导力研究”(22STA011)的阶段性成果。
关键词 领导干部 治理能力 考评指标体系 Leading Cadres Governance Ability Evaluation Index System
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献65

  • 1习近平.在庆祝中国共产党成立95周年大会上的讲话[J].先锋,2021(4):4-13. 被引量:11
  • 2胡祥.近年来治理理论研究综述[J].毛泽东邓小平理论研究,2005(3):25-30. 被引量:54
  • 3[1]Tucker L R, Lewis C. The reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1973, 38: 1~10
  • 4[2]Steiger J H, Lind J M. Statistically-based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the Psychometrika Society Meeting, IowaCity, May, 1980
  • 5[3]Bentler P M, Bonett D G. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 1980, 88: 588~ 606
  • 6[4]Bentler P M. Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin,1990, 107: 238~ 246
  • 7[5]McDonald R P, Marsh H W. Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness-of-fit. Psychological Bulletin, 1990,107: 247~ 255
  • 8[6]Marsh H W, Balla J R, Hau K T. An evaluation of incremental fit indices: A clarification of mathematical and empirical processes. In: Marcoulides G A, Schumacker R E eds. Advanced structural equation modeling techniques. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1996. 315~ 353
  • 9[7]Browne M W, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen K A, Long J S eds. Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1993. 136~ 162
  • 10[8]Joreskog K G, Srbom D. LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago: Scientific Software International, 1993

共引文献1758

同被引文献32

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部