摘要
因应现代社会抗制新型风险的需要,现代刑法大量使用兜底条款的立法技术,可能与罪刑法定原则要求的明确性存在矛盾,二者关系需要审慎认定。兜底条款明确性具有现实价值与规范价值。兜底条款的明确性应结合是否颁布司法解释、司法解释是否科学合理以及是否存在情势变更等因素综合判断。兜底条款明确性的完善路径包括对不明确兜底条款进行提法修改、删除或另立新罪;赋予法官对兜底条款明确性的法律解释权并建构多维社会监督机制;完善最高司法机关涉兜底条款的案例指导制度、注重判决书的说理作用等。
In response to the need of modern society to resist new risks,modern criminal law uses a large number of legislative techniques of bottom covering clauses,which may contradict the clarity required by the principle of legality.The relationship between the two needs to be carefully identified.The clearness of the bottom covering clause has practical value and normative value.The clarity of the bottom covering clause should be comprehensively judged by such factors as whether the judicial interpretation is issued,whether the judicial interpretation is scientific and reasonable,and whether there is a change of circumstances.The way to improve the clarity of the disclosure clause includes revising the unclear bottom covering clause,deleting it or setting up a new crime;giving the judge the right of legal interpretation of the clarity of the bottom covering clause and construct a multi-dimensional social supervision mechanism;improving the case guidance system from the highest judicial organ and payingmore attention to the reasoning role of the judgment.
作者
鲍博
BAO Bo(School of Law,Zhejiang Gongshang University,Hangzhou Zhejiang 310018,China)
出处
《齐齐哈尔大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
2023年第7期25-29,共5页
Journal of Qiqihar University(Philosophy & Social Science Edition)
基金
国家社会科学基金项目:基于死刑限制适用的终身监禁制度研究(17BFX006)。
关键词
新型风险
明确性
兜底条款
司法解释
案例指导制度
new risks
clarity
bottom covering clause
judicial interpretation
case guidance system
