摘要
“异常”的体貌特征与生理指标使双性人运动员的参赛资格备受争议。这一争议在相当大的程度上固然是一个科学问题,但科学对双性人运动员在性别和能力上的判断和区分并不是精确的,也不可能做到精确,参赛资格依然有许多伦理探讨的空间。公平是判断参赛资格是否合理的核心理由,所有论证都围绕竞技公平展开。为了实现竞技公平,不仅要展示竞技体育对待运动员在先天与后天因素方面的相对特殊性,也需要具体挖掘比赛分类的必要原则,还可尝试以双性人身份认同的论证对何为公平进行补强。在现有的科学水平下,允许双性人运动员不附任何条件地参加女性比赛,完全满足科学层面和伦理层面的双重要求。
“Abnormal”physical characteristics and physiological indicators have made the contestability of intersex athletes controversial.This controversy is of course a scientific issue to a considerable extent,but scientific judgments and distinctions of the sexes and abilities of bisexual athletes are not precise,nor can they be precise,and there are still room for ethical discussions on the qualifications for participation.Fairness is the core reason for judging whether the eligibility for the competition is reasonable.All the arguments are centered on fair competition.In order to achieve fairness in competition,not only must the of competitive sports shows distinctiveness on treating athletes in terms of innate and acquired factors,but also the specific principles of competition classification need to be specifically explored.Attempts can also be made to supplement what is fair with the argument of bisexual identity.Under the current scientific level,bisexual athletes are allowed to participate in women's competitions without any conditions,which fully meets the dual requirements of science and ethics.
出处
《人大法律评论》
2021年第2期126-157,共32页
Renmin University Law Review
基金
中国科协2021年“高端科技创新智库青年项目——智能算法在社会治理中的挑战、机遇与发展对策研究”(项目编号:2021ZZZLFZB1207065)的阶段性研究成果。
关键词
竞技公平
参赛资格
双性人
身份认同
科学
Competitive fairness
Qualifications for participation
Intersex
Identity
Science
